Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HawaiianGecko
Exactly, Playboy especially in the fifties by todays standards would probably be rated PG-13. Even today It's just naked women as a posed to hard core smut in magazines like penthouse hustler etc. I don't care for Hefner that much mainly because an old man in his pj's who cant let go of the glory days is just rather sad.
102 posted on 04/11/2006 8:43:52 AM PDT by spikeytx86 (Pray for Democrats for they have been brainwashed by there fruity little club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: spikeytx86

Playboy figured large in our imagination back in the 50s and early 60s. There are probably a lot of guys - myself included - who can tell you where they snuck a furtive look at their first Playboy - in my case, Brown's Pharmacy (now defunct) in Seattle's Ravenna neighborhood, circa 1962.


104 posted on 04/11/2006 8:47:59 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

To: spikeytx86

I agree that Playboy is quite tame judging by todays standards. (Seen anything on the Internet lately?)
I also wonder where, in the free sexual society that *we* have today, are those slick, glossy mags with the cute, airbrushed guy hotties for us girls?
You know, the hetero ones?
Am I looking in the wrong places? What happened to 'equality'?


114 posted on 04/11/2006 9:02:42 AM PDT by carmenbmw (I think I know, lol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson