Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: poindexter
I don't even think that you can call Playboy 'pornography'. There is really nothing vulgar or over the top about it. Its pictures of nude women. *gasp*

But you are right in the 50s that was breakthrough.

22 posted on 04/11/2006 7:50:58 AM PDT by conserv13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: conserv13


It sure isn't Hustler...is it?

Honeslty, in reading this article, if one doesn't know that women should "not" be raped or degraded as just one of life's givens....whether or not that individual watches porn, they have problems.

IMHO, porn isn't the cause of a violent condition, merely a symptom of an already existing condition.


47 posted on 04/11/2006 8:00:19 AM PDT by in hoc signo vinces ("Houston, TX...a waiting quagmire for jihadis. American gals are worth fighting for!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: conserv13
I don't even think that you can call Playboy 'pornography'.

I have to agree with you on that statement. If 1950's Playboy was pornography what the hell do we call the statue of David?

 

49 posted on 04/11/2006 8:00:59 AM PDT by HawaiianGecko (Timing has a lot to do with the outcome of a rain dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson