[Antoninus]

You made the point that a magazine that didn't have naked women in it but included serious articles and interviews wouldn't survive.

No, that wasn't my point. My point was that minus the titty pics, Playboy was one of thousands of similar magazines that existed in the 1950s--the vast majority of which are now defunct. Playboy, sans boobage, would have most likely gone under as well.

You were incorrect in your supposition, simply based on the three publications I named.

No, I wasn't. I'm sorry you misunderstood it.

[steve-b]

You made the point that a magazine that didn't have naked women in it but included serious articles and interviews wouldn't survive.

No, that wasn't my point.

Lying about what you said right here on this very thread combines stupidity and arrogance in one package. How very efficient of you.