[conserv13]

I don't think Playboy is pornography.

Also, take a look at a list of interviews that Playboy has published in the 60's:

Martin Luther King, Jr.
Frank Sinatra
Jimmy Hoffa
Ayn Rand
Malcolm X

[Skooz]

I think that Playboy qualifies as pornography, but certainly of the soft variety. But porn, nonetheless.

I once had the issue with the long John Lennon interview. I was a huge Lennon fan at the time, and would have bought it just for that.

I finally noticed the interview about 6 months after I bought the mag. :0)

[Antoninus]

Also, take a look at a list of interviews that Playboy has published in the 60's:

Of course, you just read Playboy for the articles, right? What do you think their cicrulation would be today if they just published interviews and not titty pics?

Answer: 0. They would have been out of business decades ago.

[Antoninus]

Also, take a look at a list of interviews that Playboy has published in the 60's:

Of course, you just read Playboy for the articles, right? What do you think their cicrulation would be today if they just published interviews and not titty pics?

Answer: 0. They would have been out of business decades ago.

[Revolting cat!]

Also, take a look at a list of interviews that Playboy has published in the 60's:

HUSTLER magazine has even better interviews now!

[ArGee]

Also, take a look at a list of interviews that Playboy has published in the 60's:

If I gave you a bowlful of sh@# with ice cream on it, would you eat it?

We're not talking about the interviews. Hefner could have published the interviews without the nudity if he had wanted to.

He put the interviews in for the same reason the baby-killers talk about stem-cell research, to put ice cream on the sh@#.

Shalom.