No, actually it is the exact opposite of the Kobe Bryant scandal. In that case the girl was actually raped
___________________________________________________
And you know this how? The woman in that particular case had the "dna" of two maybe three men on her when she claimed that she had been raped. She selectively outcried afterwards.
You might say you believed she was raped. And she might have been. But the chances of making a case when she was a walking sperm bank was slim to none. But she got her nuisance money.
I think the encounter was initially consenual. But if and when she says no and the male does not stop, it goes from being consenual sex to rape. I think this is what happened in Bryant's case
That is simply not true. The DNA of one boyfriend was found. So in your world anyone who has sex with their significant other in close proximity to being raped should not be allowed to press charges? We'll call it the "virgins only" rape defense.