Some will say that this may only small quantity of Chemical Weapons Agents to be used to train their Chemical platoon and it is not an indication of large stocks of Chemical weapons. I think that is wrong first because the mere existence of these Chemical Weapons agent, regardless of its quantity, was totally prohibited for Saddam regime to us. Second, I read hundred of pages of Al Qadysia documents and I concluded that the Iraqis were obsessed with Chemical training for their Chemical platoons and their troops. Why that obsession if they did not have the intention to produce Chemical weapons.
1 posted on
04/10/2006 11:17:06 AM PDT by
jveritas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: eyespysomething
Saddam Chemical Weapons training.
2 posted on
04/10/2006 11:17:55 AM PDT by
jveritas
(Hate can never win elections.)
To: jveritas
I'm surprised anthrax isn't listed here. Thanks for the hard work, jveritas!
3 posted on
04/10/2006 11:20:16 AM PDT by
Peach
To: jveritas
I believe critics would answer your question by stating that the training was defensive in nature because they expected an enemy to use the weapons against their own troops.
Was there anything in the documents to point towards protecting their own troops from the effect of their own use of those weapons?
4 posted on
04/10/2006 11:22:49 AM PDT by
saganite
(The poster formerly known as Arkie 2)
To: jveritas
They also had chemical warfare training classes at Habaniyah and I'll bet you can guess why I know this as a fact with no uncertainty.
7 posted on
04/10/2006 11:25:37 AM PDT by
Eagle Eye
(There ought to be a law against excess legislation.)
To: jveritas
Second, I read hundred of pages of Al Qadysia documents and I concluded that the Iraqis were obsessed with Chemical training for their Chemical platoons and their troops. Why that obsession if they did not have the intention to produce Chemical weapons. What kind of "chemical training" were they obsessed about? I mean, the U.S. military has chemical platoons and conducts chemical training even though we no longer plan to use them ourselves. I can't recall the number of times I had to go into the ol' gas chamber to swallow my fill of CS. So I guess the question is whether the training you describe is for protection/detection/decontamination, or for delivery.
I'm not saying that I disagree with your overall conclusion, because I don't. I just want to make sure we don't overstate the case in a few instances, because we know the MSM will focus on those few overstatements as a way to discredit what otherwise is a valid conclusion.
13 posted on
04/10/2006 11:34:50 AM PDT by
XJarhead
To: jveritas; Thunder 6
The Practical (Applied) Training Schedule
This appears to be the key to me. While it's true that chemical units do decontamination work, that is not all that this says.
A "practical training schedule" means that they are going ou to do some actual detecting. To do actual detecting, they must have the chemicals on hand for the troops to practice on.
That means, at a minimum, that they had small quantitities for training their troops.
Such small quantities would be deadly in the hands of a terrorist delivery system.
(T6 will correct me if I'm wrong.)
14 posted on
04/10/2006 11:35:04 AM PDT by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It. Supporting our Troops Means Praying for them to Win!)
To: jveritas
I haven't looked at this in detail, but this could well be defensive in nature. In other words, training to detect chemical agents dispersed by an enemy (e.g., Iran or the US). Can you point me to a clearly offensive training operation?
18 posted on
04/10/2006 11:40:50 AM PDT by
expatpat
To: jveritas
THANK you for doing this, j!!
As I see this forum deteriorating into madness out there, it is YOUR work that keeps me hopeful that there is still a point to all this.
24 posted on
04/10/2006 11:49:18 AM PDT by
ohioWfan
(PROUD Mom of an Iraqi LIBERATION Vet! THANKS, son!!.)
To: chillout
Here's the latest document translation.
27 posted on
04/10/2006 11:52:23 AM PDT by
SittinYonder
(That's how I saw it, and see it still.)
To: jveritas
28 posted on
04/10/2006 11:55:17 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
(O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
To: jveritas
29 posted on
04/10/2006 12:00:11 PM PDT by
conservatism_IS_compassion
(The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters but PR.)
To: jveritas
The UN weapons inspectors hired a US firm to conduct geophysical investigations during the time period from approximately 1997-98 for possible buried items in Iraq. Included among their "finds"were areas where the geophysical people's electromagnetics determined there were dumped chemicals. It was clear that part of the Iraqi's method for beating the system was to dump/bury suspect items before the weapons inspectors could find them.
The geophysics people described the Iraq country side pristine as compared to lots of buried wires, pipes, etc. in the US.
To: jveritas
You make me want to learn Arabic so I can help you out with this.
35 posted on
04/10/2006 12:23:01 PM PDT by
July 4th
(A vacant lot cancelled out my vote for Bush.)
To: jveritas
Sir, I noticed documents released on 4/07 and 4/08 have been "pulled" from the website. A couple of them looked rather interesting.
Any thoughts ?
48 posted on
04/10/2006 12:59:43 PM PDT by
genefromjersey
(So much to flame;so little time !)
To: jveritas
Jveritas,
No doubt the MSM peeks in here each day and no doubt with each of your translations the MSM is getting an increasingly worse migraine headache as critical mass approaches.
They (MSM) know that at some point that they will have to begin reporting on the new information coming from the documents. And they also know that saying the documents are fake won't work.
Jveritas and all the other translators have the MSM in a real quagmire.
Good work!
50 posted on
04/10/2006 1:02:10 PM PDT by
avacado
To: jveritas
54 posted on
04/10/2006 1:13:12 PM PDT by
rightinthemiddle
(Islamic Terrorists, the Mainstream Media and the Democrat Party Have the Same Goals in Iraq.)
To: jveritas
Talk about too little too late.......
Am I the only one that gets angry reading these "smoking gun" documents now that the pooch, cattle and the neighbors canary has been screwed?
To: jveritas
63 posted on
04/10/2006 1:51:04 PM PDT by
Danae
(Anál nathrach, orth' bháis's bethad, do chél dénmha)
To: jveritas
Excellent work!
Drive on!
65 posted on
04/10/2006 2:13:59 PM PDT by
roaddog727
(P=3/8 A. or, P=plenty...............)
To: jveritas
69 posted on
04/10/2006 4:52:34 PM PDT by
COEXERJ145
(Real Leaders Base Their Decisions on Their Convictions. Wannabes Base Decisions on the Latest Poll.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson