Thanks for the link. That's the new lie from the Bushbots, that he never said that. Now their arguments for their god politician are so weak that they sound like Clintonites, trying to make someone stop in the middle of debate to make them reference every point. That's what arguing with liberals is like. Republicans remind me of liberals more and more every day.
Of course Bush called patriotic citizens "vigilantes." Next thing you know they'll be telling us we had to be there or it didn't happen. These Bots are a hoot.
Second, one can agree with someone on most issues and disagree on a few. That has been the basis of many pro-lifers getting elected by "moderates" over the years, namely that their one disagreement was not as important as, say, the WOT.
Bush's phenomenal strength has been a vision for how to defeat Islamofascism, and his blind spot has been the borders/illegals. No president is perfect. Name me one ELECTABLE candidate who is for 100% deportation and I'll vote for him and, no, it would not be Tancredo nationally.