Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

There IS a problem with global warming... it stopped in 1998
The Sunday Telegraph (UK) ^ | April 9, 2006 | by Bob Carter

Posted on 04/09/2006 8:30:27 AM PDT by aculeus

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last
Big surprise: lefties lie.
1 posted on 04/09/2006 8:30:29 AM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: aculeus; DaveLoneRanger; GreenFreeper; freepatriot32


2 posted on 04/09/2006 8:31:58 AM PDT by FOG724 (http://nationalgrange.org/legislation/phpBB2/index.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

-bttt-


3 posted on 04/09/2006 8:32:30 AM PDT by rellimpank (Don't believe anything about firearms or explosives stated by the mass media---NRABenefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

4 posted on 04/09/2006 8:32:49 AM PDT by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Big surprise:
Nope, The coming "ice age" is due to global warming, don't you remember?

"It hasn't been this warm in 150 years!" Is the cry. Well guess what that means? 150 years ago it WAS this warm.
Never to be confused by the facts, both global warming AND global cooling are due to global warming!

(/Hopefully obvious sarcasm from time to time)

Cordially,
GE
5 posted on 04/09/2006 8:38:46 AM PDT by GrandEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Aliens Cause Global Warming
6 posted on 04/09/2006 8:38:53 AM PDT by mugs99 (Don't take life too seriously, you won't get out alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

bttt


7 posted on 04/09/2006 8:40:32 AM PDT by kalee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

I'm looking forward to the Pole Shift.


8 posted on 04/09/2006 8:40:56 AM PDT by bmwcyle (We got permits, yes we DO! We got permits, how 'bout YOU?;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

Global Warming is a product of Social Science - which is no science at all.


9 posted on 04/09/2006 8:43:38 AM PDT by Lexington Green (Social Science is not science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

1998? Isn't that when we impeached Clinton? Maybe getting rid of all that hot air solved global warming.


10 posted on 04/09/2006 8:45:29 AM PDT by ReaganIncarnate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lexington Green

I know.

I read the article on FR the other day reference the sun's growing heatwaves. How exactly can the left pin the sun's increasing heat on President Bush?

Simple: Lie, lie, lie.


11 posted on 04/09/2006 8:45:49 AM PDT by Emmet Fitzhume ("It is better to be alone than in bad company.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
"The problem here is not that of climate change per se, but rather that of the sophisticated scientific brainwashing that has been inflicted on the public, bureaucrats and politicians alike."

Again, neurolinguistic programming...

Just like the "Bush lied and people died" effort that has been part of the MSM/Dem program since 2004.
12 posted on 04/09/2006 8:46:07 AM PDT by RedEyeJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

It is very interesting that it is the "geologists" who have the most credibility on climate research.

Every climatologist should be required to take geology classes and a history of earth's climate course.

You'd really think they would have but apparently not.


13 posted on 04/09/2006 8:48:48 AM PDT by JustDoItAlways
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle
I'm looking forward to the Pole Shift.

Yeah....that one could be a Loo Looo.

If the magnetic field of the Earth suddenly changed, and this DOES happen naturally every 250,000 years or so, the consequences would be fascinating. For life, we can see from the fossil record that the past field changes had no significant effect on living organisms. This is most curious because the field reversal ( North magnetic pole shifting to antarctica and the South magnetic pole shifting to the arctic region in the Northern Hemisphere) one might expect the field to go to zero strength for a century or so.

This would let cosmic rays freely penetrate to the Earth's surface and cause mutations. This seems not to have had much effect in the past, so we probably don't really know what is going on during these field reversals. There have been a dozen of them over the last few million years, documented in the rock which has emerged and solidified along the mid-Atlantic Ridge where continental plates are slowly separating. These epochs form parallel bands all long the ridge where the rock has stored a fossilized image of the local orientation of the Earth's magnetic field for the last few million years.

Magnetic field wandering would let the aurora borealis occur at any latitude, but other than that there would be no noticeable effects other than changes in the amount of cosmic rays that penetrate to the ground. Even this effect is minimal because we can visit the Arctic and Antarctic and only receive a slight increase in cosmic rays. So long as the strength of the field remains high during this field wandering event, the effects should be pretty benign.

The Earth's magnetic field is believed to be generated by the rotation of the Earth's molten iron-nickel core. The period of field reversal is determined by the rotation rate of the core and its electrical conductivity. If you were to change either one of these, the field orientation, strength and '250,000 year cycle' would be increased or decreased. We also know from studies of the Sun's magnetic dynamo, that this phenomenon can change abruptly as it did during the 'Little Ice Age' on the Earth a few hundred years ago. There were no sunspots observed on the Sun for 50 years or so, then rather abruptly, the familiar 11-year cycle started-up over the course of a few decades. A similar 'chaotic' phenomenon may occur with the Earth 'suddenly' loosing its magnetic field for a few million years.

Already, geophysicists have begun to notice a decline in the strength of the Earth's magnetic field, suggesting that the next field reversal epoch may be about to start. It may, however, take a long time to get here, and we don't really know if the decline is just a natural, ripple, or the portend of something far more sinister.

14 posted on 04/09/2006 8:49:10 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (Pain is nothing. Pain is weakness leaving the body.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GrandEagle
"It hasn't been this warm in 150 years!" Is the cry. Well guess what that means? 150 years ago it WAS this warm. Never to be confused by the facts, both global warming AND global cooling are due to global warming!

The temperature goes up and the temperature goes down. That's the way it is on the Planet Earth.

If there is a permanent "Global Warming" due to greenhouse gasses, just think of it as "Glaciation Insurance".

The Little Ice Age (LIA) was a period of cooling lasting approximately from the 14th to the mid-19th centuries, although there is no generally agreed start or end date: some confine the period to 1550-1850. This cooler period occurs after a warmer era known as the Medieval climate optimum................One of the difficulties in identifying the causes of the Little Ice Age is the lack of consensus on what constitutes "normal" climate. While some scholars regard the LIA as an unusual period caused by a combination of global and regional changes, other scientists see glaciation as the norm for the Earth and the Medieval Warm Period (as well as the Holocene interglacial period) as the anomalies requiring explanation (Fagan).


15 posted on 04/09/2006 8:51:24 AM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

"Embracing Socialism/Communism is the the only hope of saving the world from Global Warming!"/sarc


16 posted on 04/09/2006 8:54:16 AM PDT by tcrlaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
They have long appreciated - ever since the early 1990s, when the global warming bandwagon first started to roll behind the gravy train of the UN Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) - that such short-term climate fluctuations are chiefly of natural origin. Yet the public appears to be largely convinced otherwise. How is this possible?

..IPCC Gravy Train

17 posted on 04/09/2006 8:55:35 AM PDT by Donald Rumsfeld Fan ("fake but accurate": NY Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Polybius
The temperature goes up and the temperature goes down. That's the way it is on the Planet Earth.
Absolutely!
18 posted on 04/09/2006 8:58:53 AM PDT by GrandEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

If it wasn't for FreeRepublic, we would never see this article in the U.S. Thanks for the post.


19 posted on 04/09/2006 9:06:56 AM PDT by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
WHAT ABOUT THE COMETS?? And the rogue meteorites??

What good is the duct tape and plastic sheeting if we can't get a good global disaster going??

20 posted on 04/09/2006 9:12:48 AM PDT by small voice in the wilderness (Quick, act casual...if they sense scorn or ridicule, they'll flee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson