Skip to comments.
Nepal King Orders Protesters Shot on Sight
Houston Chronicle ^
| April 8, 2006
| BINAJ GURUBACHARYA Associated Press Writer
Posted on 04/08/2006 2:12:05 AM PDT by sagar
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
To: angkor
"I was last in Pokara just as the Maoists were starting up (1996), and I met a few of them running my hotel, they were obviously in sympathy."
Yes, Pokhara was one of the starting points for Maoism.
"The basic beef at the time was that the royals were stealing everything they could get their hands on (in particular foreign aid);"
Interesting. Politicians are thought as corrupt in Kathmandu(where I lived). The king has hardly any control over foreign aid. They go directly to the ministries and that are run by senior ministers, junior ministers, and co-ministers. For example, the Road Department alone had 6 ministers at one time. One was the senior minister, 2 junior ministers, and 3 co-ministers from other departments. My dad was working as an engineer and used to say that whenever there was the influx of foreign aid, all the money would go to the ministers. There, they'd divide it... and pick their cronies(usually sons or son in laws) as "contractors". Then, the contractors would hire laborers and buy materials.
Laborers were paid peanuts and materials were never up to the standard. My dad had to "sign" all papers, so he would be technically responsible for the quality of the highway under his supervision. I remember him getting mad whenever there was the influx of foreign aid or new ministers being added to the department. He had to make those elected bastards with no education happy just to keep his engineering job.
"that they ran the country like a serfdom (hard to argue with that); and that they provided absolutely nothing to the people, especially outside Kathmandu."
King lost all his power after 1990 revolution. He remained only the figurehead. I doubt the dire economic situation was due to him. Of course, the king could care less, but I don't think he was directly responsible.
"At the time I argued that Maoism and communism had recently fallen apart everywhere throughout the world, and they reluctantly agreed, except that "We are a poor country, and this is where we have to start." We continued a bit, then they appeared angry, and I changed hotels the next day."
Yeah, that was the feeling. I was in the 8th grade in 1996, but grew up in a politically charged household. So I was kept up to date with all political news and events. Half in my extended family were monarchists(mostly mom's side), a quarter had political hopes(Nepali Congress), and a whole quarter were commies(of non-Maoist, but Marxist brand).
21
posted on
04/08/2006 3:53:52 AM PDT
by
sagar
To: sagar
Yeah, your pictures of home are gorgeous. And for what it's worth, I think most of us support the monarchy in Nepal as well.
Do you think that, realistically, there's a chance that the Maoist rebels could be put down permanently?
Or that an alliance with India could be formed?
22
posted on
04/08/2006 3:56:55 AM PDT
by
Alexander Rubin
(Octavius - You make my heart glad building thus, as if Rome is to be eternal.)
To: sagar
This is the King who was a second son and he shot his older brother, the then king, younger brother, their wives and children so he could be king. He was nuts long before this.
That he could become king after that is amazing.
23
posted on
04/08/2006 3:57:39 AM PDT
by
Dudoight
To: Dudoight
"This is the King who was a second son and he shot his older brother, the then king, younger brother, their wives and children so he could be king. He was nuts long before this."
Well, he could not have shot it, because he was outside of the city. His son was present in the palace with his cousin(then crown prince). Both apparently were high on drugs.
The crown prince, according to the official story, was unhappy at his mother for rejecting his girlfriend(a princess from another royal house). Mad and high on drugs, he shot everybody before/after dinner. The cousin was spared and allegedly tried to convince the crown prince not to kill the family members.
After killing almost all family members, the crown prince either shot himself or was shot by palace guards.
I personally don't think there was a conspiracy.
24
posted on
04/08/2006 4:14:55 AM PDT
by
sagar
To: sagar
Communists are now 'pro-democracy'?
The MSM never ceases to amaze me.
25
posted on
04/08/2006 4:19:01 AM PDT
by
ovrtaxt
(Join the FR folding team!! http://vspx27.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/main.py?qtype=teampage&teamnum=36120)
To: Ronin
Besides, didn't this king make it into power by blowing away the rest of his family? Close. The official story was that the Crown Prince went nuts and blew his family away and then committed suicide.
26
posted on
04/08/2006 4:35:52 AM PDT
by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(Sign up to donate monthly and you will be automatically entered in our "Win a Bear Hug Contest")
To: sagar
The protesters have the backing of communist rebels, who are separately fighting against the king's rule and formed a loose alliance with the political parties in December. Gyanendra dismissed the prime minister in February last year, saying he needed full powers to check the growing communist insurgency, which has killed some 13,000 people since 1996. I agree with the king. Communists are in need of immediate execution. Their influence is a danger to all free people and nations.
If communists began threatening trouble on these shores, I would advocate the same policy. In fact I think this nation may be closer to implementing it than most Dims are aware.
27
posted on
04/08/2006 4:54:57 AM PDT
by
Caipirabob
(Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: Caipirabob
However, this king is not exactly a benevolent monarch. The people are in bad shape economically. That provides the breeding ground for the commies.
28
posted on
04/08/2006 6:17:31 AM PDT
by
Dudoight
To: Dudoight
You're right. He stinks as a King, any chance we can get him to run for the Senate? *grin*
29
posted on
04/08/2006 6:24:02 AM PDT
by
Caipirabob
(Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: sagar; GhengisKhan
Interesting connection between names - Machupuchre in Nepal, and Machu Pichu in Peru. Have you read "Prrof of World Vedic Culture's Global Existence" by Stephen Knapp? There are many linguistic connections between South America and Sanskrit, as well as cultural.
To: sagar
Thanks for the ping. Family going back there before too long...
31
posted on
04/08/2006 9:07:44 AM PDT
by
WorkingClassFilth
(Di'ver'si'ty (adj.): A compound word derived from the root words: division; perversion; adversity.)
To: traviskicks
i didnt know nepal passed the patriot act :-)
32
posted on
04/08/2006 9:53:29 AM PDT
by
freepatriot32
(Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
To: Gengis Khan
There, got your name right.
33
posted on
04/08/2006 12:46:19 PM PDT
by
little jeremiah
(Tolerating evil IS evil.)
To: little jeremiah
Thanks for the ping! Good to hear from you!
To: Gengis Khan
Been really busy lately.... Not much time for FRing.
Will ping you to an article soon!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson