[Always Right]

We're not talking about immigration, we're talking about ILLEGAL immigration.

It is only illegal since some bean counters say we can only have x number of legal immigrants. The numbers of legal immigrants allowed in has been way too low for many years. To me, the difference between legal and illegal is arbitrary.

[Bikers4Bush]

Congratulations, you have completed your conversion to liberal globalist.

You'll need to see the fine folks at DU to pick up your certificate.

[Ursus arctos horribilis]

Quisling and scofflaw, tell us, do you scoff at all laws, or are you pro-choice as to which laws you choose to disobey?

[tertiary01]

To me, the difference between legal and illegal is arbitrary

I'll bet you never get picked for a jury panel.

[Godebert]

"It is only illegal since some bean counters say we can only have x number of legal immigrants. The numbers of legal immigrants allowed in has been way too low for many years. To me, the difference between legal and illegal is arbitrary."

Then American citizenship is "arbitrary".

[TomGuy]

To me, the difference between legal and illegal is arbitrary.

Why do we even have laws, then? If you consider that the invaders from foreign nations are not here illegally, then we have no sovereignty as a Nation. It is not arbitrary.

The Founding Fathers established the law; they called it The Constitution of the United States of America. Thusly, they established a nation and defined the sovereignty of that nation. Those who come into this Nation, except by the means established by law, are here illegally.

[Paul Ross]

To me, the difference between legal and illegal is arbitrary.

Another clear divide between you and Ronald Reagan.

Indentical views! LOL!

Yours are more likely as per Leaky Leahy who even had the gall to claim McCain-Kennedy wasn't an amnesty! His support? The New York Times said so!

[Aarchaeus]

So, you've used that line to get out of paying traffic tickets? And you're OK with carrying things out of stores without paying for them?