Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SirLinksalot
That's the opposite of the attitude among employers in the United States, where the prevailing rule is "fire at will." There's much less risk in taking on a new employee -- if she does a mediocre job, or the need for it disappears, a company can give her the gate. From individual dismissals to mass layoffs, employers generally don't need to ask permission from anyone.

This is a gross over-simplification. Firing someone "for cause" in the U.S. may be relatively easy, but it is a case to be avoided if at all possible, lest you wind up in a lawsuit for wrongful termination. The best way to get rid of the deadwood is through larger layoffs, where, hey it's nothing personal, it's just that your position went away...

8 posted on 04/06/2006 10:29:11 AM PDT by kevkrom ("...no one has ever successfully waged a war against stupidity" - Orson Scott Card)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: kevkrom
There does seem to be a muddying of the waters between firing and laying off or as we say redundancy.
9 posted on 04/06/2006 12:33:29 PM PDT by snugs (An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson