Posted on 04/06/2006 5:45:49 AM PDT by dinasour
Tony Snow is back and better than ever!
You can find out more information about the line-up, stream Tony's show, find local radio stations as well as other fun stuff off his website.
CLICK HERE and follow the "Listen Live" link to stream the show which runs from 9 AM est to noon.
moongriffon.com streams the show every day from 3:00 to 6:00 PM (EDT).
WKRC airs Tony’s show on the web from 9-12 EST. Another way to hear Tony’s show is by streaming it at 7pm CST on klif.com
You can also listen to Tony on WGTX live, in color and on time
A more comprehensive list of streaming servers is available here.
XM Channel 168 also airs the show for satellite radio subscribers.
Also Tony is back on Sirius channel 145
To call the show and talk to Tony dial: 1.866.408.SNOW
And there's more!
Here's the deal: For those fans who would like to ask for a photo-- please send an email request to Tony at tonysnow@foxnews.com (please note in the subject line of the email "For Tony") and provide your home mailing (not email) address. Tony will send you a real, actual, signed photo -- not stuff that people have to download. Please pass it on.By the way, if you miss anything, the show is streamed again immediately after the three hours. Please feel free to add thread narrative about what is aired on the show as a group effort is helpful to get more of the content posted and is much appreciated by those reading the thread later. If you’d like on or off the Tony Snow Show ping list, please post a request. All requests happily honored.
"Woof" is used in broadcasting to say "stop," "that's enough" or to mark a specific point in time -- which is what is done in this case. "Tony's show starts in 3 minutes: WOOF!" Means in 3 minutes from-- NOW!
Nothing like a little old-fashioned family squabble, eh?
Their contract with NBC ends this year.
Oh No!
Let me know if Tony mentions.. I've jumped on conference calls and can't listen.
I think Fox may get the next contract! :)
Thankfully.
You should hear Howie Carr talk about Cardinal Mahoney. Apparently he was one of those higher ups who protected the pedophile priests. If Howie is correct, and he usually is, I've no use for anything Mahoney says. I'm Catholic, btw.
This is the core argument that is being summarized in all the talk about walls and fences. Are we going to enforce our laws and stop people crossing what is effectively an open border. I think the fence, as described by Tom Tancredo, which is 700 miles long, is intended as a funneling mechanism to move the bulk of the crossings to areas that are more easily controlled.
Of course individuals or groups using extreme measures will breach or otherwise bypass a physical barrier, but proper surveillance with a reasonable amount of resources will solve that. In the areas that your large volume will shift to you place more human assets to deal with the traffic.
I would suggest that we don't want to expand the Border Patrol as it now exists to try to do this. I think the organization has shown itself to be institutionally incapable of meeting this challenge. Instead I would extend the charter and structure of the Coast Guard and add border security to their current seacoast security mandate (maybe fold in the Border Patrol as part of this?). The Coast Guard is one of the most effective and efficient institutions we have in this country, it already has police powers and is not constrained by Posse Comitatus as the Army or Marines are. It also has responsiblity for this role for our sea coast.
In addition they are the world class at rescue operations. Think of the thousands of people plucked from rooftops during Katrina. Nothing even remotely like that has even been done on that scale before. Therefore, in addition to managing the border patrol/security tasks and augmenting the actual Border Patrol officers in what they now do with more high tech assets (more helicopters, MEU like resources, other things, as needed) I would envision such a force as a rapid reaction arm of Homeland Security for any kind of emergency, whether it be a natural disaster or a terrorist incident. I would further get Congress to pass legislation authorizing the President to detach any Pentagon assets to work as part of this force for the duration of an emergency, which should place them under the command of and rules of this proposed enhanced Coast Guard organization (Border Guard, Home Guard?). That should elminate any questions about Posse Comitatus for Army or other US Military units now barred from many tasks, such as civilian crowd control.
I would want such a force to be structured like Marine Expeditionary Units, with their own logistics and some rapid deployment capabilities. Base them in the border regions with the "normal" task of patrolling our borders with Mexico (and Canada, if necessary). Base and train them in places along the border like Sierra Vista, New Mexico, El Paso, Texas and Yuma Arizona. When an incident happens anywhere else in the country you can then rapidly deploy these assets, as needed, using detached units from the Air Force, or other appropriate means to supplement the built in logistics. Maybe even give AMTRAK a useful reserve role to justify all of the money we've poured down that black hole. You might pre-position certain heavy equipment at key locations throughout the country or designate appropriate existing installations and equipment for detachment at need.
How say you? Within the realm of possibilities?
Where can I get the Mousasowi trial on TV?
If illegal entry was a felony, what would they do with them? What would have to change from the judicial and law enforcement point of view... will they be housed here or get the popular court return? Will they be deported?
Something has to be done.
This is not the first time Mahoney has been on the wrong side of something. That being said, I know for a fact that they will not and should not ask about immigration status at Mass and the parish. Charity comes without strings. I will not budge on that. Now building a shelter for illegals that crosses the line. But I hardly think that the entire Church should be drug through the mud once again either.
It's in Federal Court--no TV allowed.
Thank youuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu!!!!!!
We are indeed :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.