Skip to comments.
CIRCUMCISION: Did you know?
The Daily Barometer ^
| Today
| Daniel Cullen
Posted on 04/05/2006 5:19:29 PM PDT by Giant Conservative
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300, 301-320, 321-340 ... 581 next last
To: tet68
"Just a little off the top."
"keep the tip"..
301
posted on
04/05/2006 11:50:07 PM PDT
by
sheik yerbouty
( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
To: FreedomCalls
Even the posted article acknowledges there are benefits--it just tries to say they are insigificant. But risk lies in the eyes of the beholder. I'd like to take this opportunity to thank my parents for circumsizing me after I was born. Any simple procedure that can reduce the odds of my johnson falling off, even a little, is a significantly beneficial procedure to me.
In fact, the risks of various diseases in the link you provide are high enough that if the USEPA were in charge of this decision, they'd ban the foreskin quicker than they banned DDT.
To: JABBERBONK
I have to admit , I don't miss my foreskin.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Assuming you were circumcised shortly after birth, how would you miss something you don't remember? You would have no basis for comparison.
303
posted on
04/06/2006 12:02:41 AM PDT
by
RipSawyer
(Acceptance of irrational thinking is expanding exponentiallly.)
To: HungarianGypsy
The people I see most against circumcision are liberal females>>>>>>>>>>>>
And I suppose you have stood around conducting exit polls at election time? There are quite a few conservative women on this list who are foreskin supporters!
The informed woman ( and man) will know that the ability for intimate contact between partners is enhanced by having a fully functional foreskin.And informed women exist on both the liberal and conservative side of politics. Sex usually cuts through political ideology, as it should.
Be informed:
http://www.circumstitions.com/Sexuality.html
304
posted on
04/06/2006 12:04:46 AM PDT
by
Candor7
(Into Liberal Flatulence Goes the Hope of the West)
To: Pan_Yans Wife
It was a lengthly study. The issue was that the virus did not have a foreskin to hide under, fester and multiply.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
This sounds like total garbage, the aids virus is carried in thick bodily fluids, blood, semen, etc., it does not "hide under" the foreskin.
305
posted on
04/06/2006 12:07:19 AM PDT
by
RipSawyer
(Acceptance of irrational thinking is expanding exponentiallly.)
To: BurbankKarl
CIRCUMCISION: Did you know I once had a wallet made out of foreskin? If you rubbed it a little it turned into a suitcase.
Was it water proof? I supposed you could have a rubber for it.
306
posted on
04/06/2006 12:07:26 AM PDT
by
Candor7
(Into Liberal Flatulence Goes the Hope of the West)
To: Giant Conservative
Having worked as a nurse for over a decade I can tell you that, in my experience, Circumcised men have few yeast infections and UTI.
This is based on 8 years in a level II Emergency Department and 4 years of clinic work. This is coming from a man who is circumcised, who's son is and his grandson is as well. I don't see the practice as barbaric. Children are unable to form memories until about 18-24 months. A procedure done a day or two after birth and supposedly remembered by the 'victim' is BS, touchy feely stuff.
307
posted on
04/06/2006 12:08:24 AM PDT
by
truemiester
(If the U.S. should fail, a veil of darkness will come over the Earth for a thousand years)
To: starfish923
You won't hear the circumcised back down. It's turned into an emotional thing and when that happens, brain turns off.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Thank you kindly! I think you are absolutely correct!
308
posted on
04/06/2006 12:16:40 AM PDT
by
RipSawyer
(Acceptance of irrational thinking is expanding exponentiallly.)
To: Michael Goldsberry
If women were getting circumcised for no good reason
Would you care to explain that procedure?
Female circumcision is barbaric in the extreme. It is done for no other purpose than to reduce sexual pleasure for a woman and increase control over them by her man or family. It is the removal of the clitoris. Many times by non-surgical means.
309
posted on
04/06/2006 12:22:40 AM PDT
by
truemiester
(If the U.S. should fail, a veil of darkness will come over the Earth for a thousand years)
To: ansel12
Your right!
No only could I not speak, I was so traumatized I wa sexually disfuntional for over a decade and incontinent for almost 2 years after my circumcision!
(like you, I was circumcised at birth)
310
posted on
04/06/2006 12:25:43 AM PDT
by
truemiester
(If the U.S. should fail, a veil of darkness will come over the Earth for a thousand years)
To: Giant Conservative
311
posted on
04/06/2006 1:47:17 AM PDT
by
familyop
("Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." --President Bush)
To: RipSawyer
Please explain to me what are the advantages of a foreskin..oh and include the appendix as well.
To: RMDupree
That would be me, I was born into an Irish Catholic family and was not cut but got it done when I was 37, as regards the sex - no difference at all. It's all baloney what they say and I was perfectly capable of keeping it clean before as I am now.
It's all a matter of taste folks, ignore the propaganda, it makes no difference one way or the other.
To: Giant Conservative
According to the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), neonatal circumcision is the result of ignorance, bad medical practice and American social and cultural pressure. Amen. Circumcision makes sense only as a Jewish or Muslim religious rite.
314
posted on
04/06/2006 4:06:06 AM PDT
by
A. Pole
(Solzhenitsyn:"Live Not By Lies" www.columbia.edu/cu/augustine/ arch/solzhenitsyn/livenotbylies.html)
To: Giant Conservative
The anti-male feminists of the United Nations unsurprisingly push circumcision as a panacea. Maybe circumcising of feminists is a good idea.
315
posted on
04/06/2006 4:07:29 AM PDT
by
A. Pole
(Solzhenitsyn:"Live Not By Lies" www.columbia.edu/cu/augustine/ arch/solzhenitsyn/livenotbylies.html)
To: American_Centurion
My sons were circ'ed by a doctor, not a barber. Why not your daughters?
316
posted on
04/06/2006 4:10:31 AM PDT
by
A. Pole
(Solzhenitsyn:"Live Not By Lies" www.columbia.edu/cu/augustine/ arch/solzhenitsyn/livenotbylies.html)
To: Publius Valerius
Indeed. I am, as will my boys. Why not your daughters? Why don't you wait until they are big enough to make usch decision for themselves?
317
posted on
04/06/2006 4:13:03 AM PDT
by
A. Pole
(Solzhenitsyn:"Live Not By Lies" www.columbia.edu/cu/augustine/ arch/solzhenitsyn/livenotbylies.html)
To: Thinkin' Gal
318
posted on
04/06/2006 5:36:01 AM PDT
by
freema
(Proud Marine FRiend, Mom, Aunt, Sister, Friend, Wife, Daughter, Niece)
To: AmericaUnite
319
posted on
04/06/2006 6:03:24 AM PDT
by
rocksblues
(Illegal Immigrant racist here.)
To: Giant Conservative
the idea that neonatal circumcision is the answer to all of mens ills is erroneous
How utterly disingenuous. I've never even heard of the penile cancer or masturbation part of it. But the venereal disease aspect, which the author so deftly avoided, is true. Of course, it may well be social in that a circumcised man is more likely to be a Christian, Jew or Muslim and thus less likely to engage in the more dangerous sexual activities.
320
posted on
04/06/2006 6:05:25 AM PDT
by
BJClinton
(No war. For oil.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300, 301-320, 321-340 ... 581 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson