In the "opinion" of the officers there was suspicious activity. They said the dog, in their "opinion", indicated the presence of drugs. Were there drugs found or was this simply a pretext to search the car?
Does this mean that police officers can search anyone's car if in their "opinion" there is reason to?
Where are the the defenders of the fourth ammendment?
I heard on TV that there was known drug activity at the house he'd just departed.