Posted on 04/05/2006 7:10:56 AM PDT by rface
....Still, the media and common Hillary-haters could not help but characterize her statements as anything but a naked election-grabbing ploy. But it seems unfair to question the sincerity of a former Sunday school teacher who attends church more regularly than President Bush. Rather, Clinton should be applauded for adding a compassionate Christian voice to a debate dominated by the religious right’s divisive agenda......
Imagine if Jesus were alive today. How might he react to the plight of an impoverished Mexican worker living just miles from America whose wife and two children are beginning to display signs of malnourishment because the worker’s wages are so paltry? If only the worker could make it across the border, he could earn twice as much money. He realizes the risks, as entering America without documentation is illegal and dangerous. But to this father, immigration restrictions pale in comparison to the survival of his offspring. So he crosses the border, hoping to send home wages that will sufficiently feed his family. Would Jesus condemn such a man, and report him to the authorities? Or would Jesus offer him food, shelter, and counsel?
The clearest answer to this question comes from the story of the good Samaritan. In response to a follower asking who exactly Christ is referring to when he says “love thy neighbor,” Jesus presents the story of a Samaritan who aids an injured Jew. Jesus’ praise of the compassionate foreigner leaves little question that Christ would exhort his followers to help a man in need, regardless of citizenship.
The immigration bill which passed the House of Representatives last December, and was introduced in the Senate by self-proclaimed Christian and Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, criminalizes exactly what Jesus asks of his followers–aiding illegal immigrants. And of all people, it was Democratic Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton who had the courage to point out the hypocrisy of many Republicans who claim to espouse Christian values but attempt to criminalize Jesus’ teachings.
“It is hard to believe that a Republican leadership that is constantly talking about values and about faith would put forward such a mean-spirited piece of legislation,” exclaimed Clinton. “It is certainly not in keeping with my understanding of the Scripture because this bill would literally criminalize the Good Samaritan and probably even Jesus himself.”
As a Christian who feels the same way, I cannot help but praise Clinton’s audacity to point out the hypocrisy of her Republican counterparts. Yet some critics, most notably President George W. Bush, have criticized Clinton for her remarks. But does that mean Clinton and other Democrats hoping to make arguments in the name of religion should be silenced?
Quite simply, no. To the contrary, Democrats with strong religious and moral convictions should be encouraged to speak out on account of their faith. For too long, Republicans have enjoyed a monopoly on the public dialogue about religion. They have invoked Christian arguments to voice opposition to selected issues like abortion, gay marriage, and stem cell research. Yet simultaneously they advocate social policies, such as this draconian immigration bill, that are antithetical to the beliefs of many Christians. In fact, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops and the Protestant-led Sojourners Magazine have both called upon their followers to oppose the bill. And this spat over immigration is occuring less than three months after Congressional Republicans ignored the pleas of 150 religious leaders who staged a nonviolent protest against a budget bill that proposed cutting $40 billion from education, health care, and child support for low-income families while giving tax cuts to the rich.
For too long Democrats have allowed Republican Christians, who claim to support “life” while advocating capital punishment, to seize the sole authority to dictate what Christians believe. Democrats such as Clinton must not be afraid to speak for the thousands of Christian Americans who vehemently oppose the Republican agenda.
Some may worry that encouraging Democrats to cite religion will turn America into a theocracy. But religion is already a force in American politics as evidenced by a poll that found that 90 percent of Americans say they want a President who believes in God. Having a multitude of religious opinions in a healthy public dialogue will not turn America into a theocracy but instead help create a consensus about our country’s shared values. Such a debate would be preferable to the monopolization of religion in the public sphere by the single version of Christianity promoted by the religious right.
The alternative would be to silence both sides; that is, forbid Democrats and Republicans from bringing any sort of religious argument into the public debate which, at best, would compromise their freedom of speech, and at worst, would force politicians to make up phony reasons for why they feel a certain way about certain issues. As many religious politicians point out, it is difficult if not impossible for them to separate their most deeply held convictions into “religious” and “non-religious” components.
Still, the media and common Hillary-haters could not help but characterize her statements as anything but a naked election-grabbing ploy. But it seems unfair to question the sincerity of a former Sunday school teacher who attends church more regularly than President Bush. Rather, Clinton should be applauded for adding a compassionate Christian voice to a debate dominated by the religious right’s divisive agenda.
Loui Itoh ’07 is a government and comparative study of religion concentrator in Quincy House.
Hitlery is DESPERATE for any traction that will keep attention off of her crimes and total lack of qualification to be President. Hopefully the 'revelations' of Mr. Paul's testimonies will put a number under Hitlery's picture, but I am not holding my breath -- I still think she is holding so much damaging information about Washington-ites, that it won't happen. Pretty sad state of affairs for our country, ain't it?
Yes, as crooked as they come...nice choice Dems.
Immigration is a simple issue if you boil it down. Those that are here should be sent home and offered a method for being here legally. Those that hire people who are illegals need to be fined so heavily they'll think twice about doing it again. The only grey area is those with children who were born here--under the law, those children are American citizens. I think something should be done for them, but not sure what that should be.
"who attends church more regularly than President Bush."
Maybe, but he goes for love of the Lord. Hillary goes for love of re-election.
Oh boy, more religious relativism from a religious concentrator in Quincy House!
This kid will change his tune when he leaves the Harvard Yard and meets the real world on his own nickel.
Complete BS argument from the start. Of course Jesus would have helped them and fed them. He called all of us as individuals to take care of those in need. This is a big difference from the role of the government. Jesus didn't call for us to whine and complain to the government to do something. Jesus didn't call for Rome to stop building walls in Gaul so the poor there could come into Rome.
Even closer to home, you didn't see Jesus demand that Rome open up borders with the Parthian Empire to end their suffering. Jesus was very clear that individuals help the poor. ..and Jesus wasn't just a spiritual leader, but as being from the line of David, could also have easily spoken for political change regarding this as well.. but he didn't..
Forgive me for getting sick to my stomach when the anti-thesis of Christian starts telling me what is biblical and what is not...
Like the caller on Rush's show said:
Liberals make political issues into moral issues (like ILLEGAL immigration) and make moral issues into political ones (like abortion).
Wonder if this writer praises Hillary on the abortion issue, invoking the name of Jesus?
Watch the tape. Just before Hillary dropped her Jesus bomb, she took a deep breath. Hillary knew exactly what she was doing, and knew the publicity she would get from it. Too bad Hillary never learned to be "slick" like her walking canker of a husband...AND YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN!!
Apparently Sister Hillary hasn't read the part of the Book that says "Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's"...
Like a valid entry visa to enter Caesar's country.
"If Jesus were alive today..."
I don't worship a dead Lord and Savior!
"Maybe, but he goes for love of the Lord. Hillary goes for love of re-election."
Ah, you don't know what's in her heart.
Come to think of it, you can't even prove she HAS a heart.
I thought the unbiblical cord was cut on Hillary a long time ago.
The few liberals and demoncrats that I do know only use the bible when it suits their purpose. None of them attend church much less are involved in a church. God does not approved of blasphemous people. Hillbillary would also not understand or know how to live and lead a life using the Bible.
IOW, open the borders but I won't even open my house doors to invited guests.
The only grey area is those with children who were born here--under the law, those children are American citizens. I think something should be done for them, but not sure what that should be.
I just read a post the other day about this...they are not US citizens if the parents are still citizens of another country when they are born. Mexicans who come here illegally are still Mexican citizens...they cannot create an American citizen just by having their kids born here....read the 14th amendment again to understand this
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1605234/posts
Post #7~
http://federalistblog.us/2005/12/birthright_citizenship_fable.html
http://idexer.com/citizenship.htm
http://federalistblog.us/mt/articles/14th_dummy_guide.htm
Even listening you could hear the hesitation to continue in her voice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.