Here's a hint: The rabble in the street isn't going to vote GOP in any circumstances.
1 posted on
04/04/2006 7:42:59 AM PDT by
SmithL
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: SmithL
California was already socialist by the time Wilson backed 187. They had already voted for Clinton in 1992.
79 posted on
04/04/2006 11:01:56 AM PDT by
Luke21
To: SmithL
Here's a hint: The rabble in the street isn't going to vote GOP in any circumstances.One need only look at the hispanic rich border counties in Texas- SOLID BLUE.
90 posted on
04/04/2006 12:37:33 PM PDT by
Rockitz
(This isn't rocket science- Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
To: SmithL
This issue is becoming an additional litmus test for whether a GOP candidate is worthy of my vote along with the abortion issue.
Pro-life + No amnesty/No Guestworker/Seal the border is the only GOP candidate that will get my vote.
93 posted on
04/04/2006 12:41:57 PM PDT by
Rockitz
(This isn't rocket science- Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
To: SmithL
No matter what, the Dems are going to run to the left of the Republicans on this issue and demagogue it into the ground. Bush already is being made out as the "bad guy" among many hispanics even though he's more liberal than most of the party on this.
As for the illegals voting, that's obviously not the concern. But many hispanic citizens -- legal voters -- see themselves as having cultural ties with the illegals, and basically vote as if they are illegals themselves. So that's how an "anti-illegal" stance can hurt at the polls. But the thing is that we've already lost that vote, and aren't going to get it back. The Dems have that ground, and won't give it back.
So if its votes that matter, the smart thing to do is run in the other direction. Not necessarily being punitive, but at least clearly being more restrictive than the Dems. There's really no downside.
98 posted on
04/04/2006 12:57:29 PM PDT by
XJarhead
To: SmithL
Well, that settles it. Time to deport in mass right now.
100 posted on
04/04/2006 1:04:29 PM PDT by
samcgwire
(samcgwire was or was not here today, depending on why you want to know.)
To: SmithL
![](http://www.sfgate.com/c/pictures/2006/04/02/in_gangs_9.jpg)
![](http://www.sfgate.com/c/pictures/2006/04/02/in_gangs_5.jpg)
![](http://www.sfgate.com/c/pictures/2006/04/02/in_gangs_10.jpg)
The Bush/Kennedy/McCain/Hillary American voters
104 posted on
04/04/2006 1:36:46 PM PDT by
SUSSA
To: SmithL; CMS; The Sailor; txradioguy; Jet Jaguar; Defender2; OneLoyalAmerican; bkwells; ...
108 posted on
04/04/2006 2:02:51 PM PDT by
68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
(How could an illegal be a "guest" of anything? What part of criminal don't RINO's understand?)
To: SmithL
Yep. If the GOP wants to outbid the Democrats for the Pedro vote by offering lavish entitlement benefits, it will deserve to lose its majority. We don't need TWO socialist parties in this country.
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
109 posted on
04/04/2006 2:08:02 PM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: SmithL
If immigration laws were enforced there wouldn't be a growing hispanic community. As far as I'm concerned this is an admission that illegals vote.
112 posted on
04/04/2006 2:15:51 PM PDT by
abigailsmybaby
("This is the sort of English up with which I will not put." Winston Churchill)
To: SmithL
So republicans don't want to alienate 12 million illegals but are willing to p*ss off 60 million republican voters.
No wonder we're in trouble. These morons can't even do simple math.
124 posted on
04/04/2006 3:13:58 PM PDT by
sergeantdave
(The business of business is none of the government's business)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson