Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Obadiah
--700 ton non-nuclear bomb--

--I'd be more afraid of the propwash from the plane that could carry a "700-ton" bomb--

18 posted on 04/03/2006 1:03:28 PM PDT by rellimpank (Don't believe anything about firearms or explosives stated by the mass media---NRABenefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: rellimpank
I'd be more afraid of the propwash from the plane that could carry a "700-ton" bomb

A fellow Freeper pointed out yesterday that testing a 700-ton bomb (in Nevada) may well be a test of the blast effects of a new (nuclear) bunker buster -- testing minus the nuke itself, in other words.

24 posted on 04/03/2006 1:10:39 PM PDT by Tallguy (When it's a bet between reality and delusion, bet on reality -- Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

Explosive capability, not mass.


25 posted on 04/03/2006 1:10:52 PM PDT by AntiKev (We pilots count our time in the air as if all other time is unimportant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

D'Oh! One too many zeros. And thank you so much for pointing that out!


55 posted on 04/03/2006 5:32:00 PM PDT by Obadiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson