Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Readers Flock to Newspapers' Online Sites
AP ^ | 4/3/6 | SETH SUTEL

Posted on 04/03/2006 10:28:31 AM PDT by SmithL

Chicago -- Newspapers' online audiences are growing rapidly, according to a new industry study, highlighting a key growth area that newspapers are seeking to exploit as print circulation continues to be challenged.

A study being released Monday by the Newspaper Association of America, a trade group, found that one in three Internet users — 55 million — visit a newspaper Web site every month.

Also, unique visitors to newspaper Web sites jumped 21 percent from January 2005 to December 2005, while the number of page views soared by 43 percent over the same period.

The study coincides with the NAA's annual convention in Chicago. Top of mind for the publishers attending was the looming sale of 12 Knight Ridder Inc. newspapers by The McClatchy Co., which is acquiring the storied publishing company in a $4.5 billion deal that will reshape the landscape of American newspapers.

Strategies for coping with the rapid transformation of consumers' news consumption habits due to the Internet was also a big topic at the three-day conference, which began Sunday.

Andrew Swinand, executive vice president at Starcom Worldwide, a major advertising-buying agency, said during a panel discussion that newspapers could do more to harness their presence online, such as getting more participation from audiences.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: internet; legacymedia; newspapers; onlinenews
Expect new charges for news access in the near-term future.
1 posted on 04/03/2006 10:28:33 AM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Save a tree -- kill a beaver, or go online!!!

Never miss a day here viewing the WSJ online -- but I get hard copy too for other readers. The ONLY newspaper I have touched for well over a decade...the MSM has seen to that.


2 posted on 04/03/2006 10:30:44 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I'm surprised it hasn't happened yet. I never read actual newspapers any more but I read all sorts of papers online. I guess sooner or later I'll have to pay.


3 posted on 04/03/2006 10:31:16 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Good luck getting me to pay for it, unless they change their political orientation.

I read the NYT online, but only because it's free. I would never help subsidize their political advocacy.

4 posted on 04/03/2006 10:31:27 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam Factoid:After forcing young girls to watch his men execute their fathers, Muhammad raped them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Expect new charges for news access in the near-term future.

like Times Select?

doomed......

5 posted on 04/03/2006 10:31:45 AM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Expect new charges for news access in the near-term future. Sure. Few people have time to read the paper in the morning, except for weekends. Why not read the same articles online at work for free? Like you say....they'll start charging soon.
6 posted on 04/03/2006 10:32:31 AM PDT by edpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA
Same here, and you're correct..but the irony is that the MOST successful paid website ever, the WSJ, is killing the print version..90%+ of WSJ revenues come from print advertisers..they know/hope, that as peopel turnt he pages, they'll see the ads..on the web..it's a different viewing patternmechanism..and it really limits the number of ads that the viewer is willing to look at..

OTOH..elimnating the print edition eraes all the costs for newsprint ink, plants, labor, delivery, etc....the WSJ website is fre now to subscribrs to the print edition..also..I'd estimate that 95% of the financial tables in the print edition are NEVER read ..they're accessed online in various forums. Ultimately, I think the WSJ will evolve to a 99% on-line read...with a tabloid version..articles and editorials only..for sale in airports, newstads, and complimentary in hotels..Their revenue will drop by 90%, but so will their costs..

7 posted on 04/03/2006 10:38:31 AM PDT by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to propagate her gene pool. Any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

My local paper, the Columbus Dispatch tried to charge for online access and found that it didn't work because there wasn't enough traffic to their website to satisfy their online advertisers. So the Dispatch went back to being a free site.


8 posted on 04/03/2006 10:39:33 AM PDT by Ticonderoga34
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
A study being released Monday by the Newspaper Association of America, a trade group, found that one in three Internet users — 55 million — visit a newspaper Web site every month.

Yeah, after being given a link to biased or stupid reporting from one of the FR threads. HA!

9 posted on 04/03/2006 10:46:53 AM PDT by Looking4Truth (Radical Muslims and Illegal immigrants: Too stupid to create so they invade or destroy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I would buy the print version of my local newspaper simply for the coupons if I didn't hate them (St Petersberg Times) so much.

Their frontpage headline the Sunday before last was all about how we are not paying enough property taxes. I swore I would NEVER buy them again almost a year ago (over a relentless barrage of how wonderful and misunderstood Michael Schiavo was), and I have stuck to that.

You would think they would realize how many readers they could pick up if they stopped alienating people over strident agendas.


10 posted on 04/03/2006 10:48:50 AM PDT by I still care ("For it is the doom of men that they forget" - Merlin, from Excalibur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zert_28

Individual papers will have a very difficult time charging for access. Just wait until a whole bunch of papers start charging at the same time.


11 posted on 04/03/2006 11:48:23 AM PDT by SmithL (Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

"Expect new charges for news access in the near-term future."

It's an interesting model. If our local paper begins to charge for access to their site, then they need to be better than the are, or I'll go elsewhere.
I think that the model that would work is for those that get the paper, give free online access. Those that don't, charge for site access.


12 posted on 04/03/2006 11:51:05 AM PDT by brownsfan (It's not a war on terror... it's a war with islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I wish online papers would provide links to pdf versions of their print adds.


13 posted on 04/03/2006 12:12:05 PM PDT by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson