The fact that you want to downplay the communist threat to India and Nepal as Paki propaganda means you are likely just a communist yourself, which your anti-American, pro-Ayatollah, pro-Soviet positions only make too clear. You were even against America's nuclear deal with India because you consider America your enemy. Well too bad for anti-Americans like you it is going through anyway.
As for "secularism" you may prefer India to be run by leftists rather than Hindu Nationalists but that's no reason to impose your Bolshevism on the Hindu nation of Nepal.
The fact that you want to downplay the communist threat to India and Nepal as Paki propaganda means you are likely just a communist yourself, which your anti-American, pro-Ayatollah, pro-Soviet positions only make too clear.
Downplay? People like you have been playing up the communist threat to India for last 50 years. So by now we should have become a Communist state. No? So what happened? Haven't had your fill with your propoganda yet?
You were even against America's nuclear deal with India because you consider America your enemy.
I am against this deal because America is extracting too high a price for the deal and secondly it opens the door for frequent arm twisting and meddling in our nuclear program by the NPT/IAEA and the anti-India hawks (such as yourself ) and there are plenty out there in Washington.
As for "secularism" you may prefer India to be run by leftists rather than Hindu Nationalists but that's no reason to impose your Bolshevism on the Hindu nation of Nepal.
Dont assume stuff about me. And if I know you well, you are an anti-Hindu. So now you want to sing a different, harp on your new found love affair with Hindu nationalism only to spite at the commies. Sorry I dont agree with your idea of WOT by starving Nepali economy. And sorry but I dont share your paranoia.