Replies

They will definitely starve to death if the communists take over.

So you dont mind making them starve through an Indian blockade as long as the commies stay away. Commies are definitely a threat but morons like you in any government are a bigger threat.

The fact that you want to downplay the communist threat to India and Nepal as Paki propaganda means you are likely just a communist yourself, which your anti-American, pro-Ayatollah, pro-Soviet positions only make too clear.

Downplay? People like you have been playing up the communist threat to India for last 50 years. So by now we should have become a Communist state. No? So what happened? Haven't had your fill with your propoganda yet?

You were even against America's nuclear deal with India because you consider America your enemy.

I am against this deal because America is extracting too high a price for the deal and secondly it opens the door for frequent arm twisting and meddling in our nuclear program by the NPT/IAEA and the anti-India hawks (such as yourself ) and there are plenty out there in Washington.

As for "secularism" you may prefer India to be run by leftists rather than Hindu Nationalists but that's no reason to impose your Bolshevism on the Hindu nation of Nepal.

Dont assume stuff about me. And if I know you well, you are an anti-Hindu. So now you want to sing a different, harp on your new found love affair with Hindu nationalism only to spite at the commies. Sorry I dont agree with your idea of WOT by starving Nepali economy. And sorry but I dont share your paranoia.

But, then, you KNOW all about Indian history, so I was preaching to the choir. Sorry. That's just what went through my mind....no "lesson" intended.

Most (but not all) Americans usually know almost ZIP about India. Their knowledge of India seems to go back only to yesterday.
And, as you know, without a HISTORY of a place, knowledge is incomplete. When knowledge is incomplete, the conclusions drawn from knowledge dated from YESTERDAY are deeply flawed.

Enforcing border security is a bigger threat than communism and trying to fight communists will make the people starve. Okay. Whatever you say. I guess the Nepalis get the same "economic benefit" from their unsecured border with India as we Americans get from our Mexican Invasion.

Communist terror kills more Indians today than Islamic terror and is the biggest terror threat India faces. You act as if India is on the verge of turning islamic and only you can stop them. You act like the islamic threat is bigger because you are sympathetic to the communist cause. Is India islamic yet?

it opens the door for frequent arm twisting and meddling

Yes you prefer to be America's enemy and oppose any movement closer between America and India because then India may actually start to act like America's ally and you don't want that. Too bad for commies like you. Your deals with the Ayatollahs might get pushed to the side so you can work with the US instead? Well boo-hoo.

And if I know you well, you are an anti-Hindu

You don't know me at all. All you know is the lies you tell about all Americans just like me who you consider your enemies. I don't believe in Hinduism but I'm not anti-Hindu, I just don't defend Hindu persecution of Christians, like you do. You remind me of leftist Christians in the US who side with the ACLU against other Christians. They suppress their own religion in the public square because they are so scared that some muslim also might be allowed to pray. They ban their own religion so they can ban islam too. They prefer tyranny to freedom because they're cowards, like you.