Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HiJinx
Have you seen this:

   From:   Roy Beck, President, NumbersUSA
Date:   Monday 3APR06     10 a.m.
 
Monday Mobilization -- 10 a.m. update**********More talking points from YOU
 
THE NATIONAL MOBILIZATION HAS BEGUN IN THE OFFICES OF SENATORS ACROSS THE LAND -- GOOD LUCK!

To all of you who have checked "Total Activism" at the bottom of your NumbersUSA User Info page, I will be sending updates through the day. (If you don't want such saturation info during peak times such as this, change your activism level to "Moderate" or "Limited.")

These will include additional information to help people who are visiting the local offices of their Senators today.

And the information is also perfect for all of you who will be continuing to make phone calls to DC and local Senate offices.

FIRST, A WORD AGAINST DISCOURAGEMENT
"Telephoning doesn't work!!!! I phoned Mel Martinez's office repeatedly, it was busy. Even at 11:30 P.M. When I finally got through to the answering machine he had on, it was just a recorded message that hung up on you when it was finished. You could not even leave a message! So I tried to fax him, that worked! I also phoned Bill Nelson's office. A man actually answered. I didn't even finish my first sentence before he cut me off and said " I will tell the Senator" and hung up on me! So I faxed him too. You keep saying "Call the Senators." They really DON"T want to hear from us. The only way I have been able to get through is by fax, which they probably ignore and throw away, so I think that the visits are the best solution."
----------Jackie


Jackie, you are exactly right that the most powerful thing anybody can do is to make a personal visit at a Senator's office -- far more powerful even than participating in a rally or march that is not at the office.

But I want to assure everybody that the phoning does work -- even when it is exasperating. The fact that staffers are being rude and short is a sign that we are overwhelming them. They are getting the message.

Now, please be sure that you are not irritating our friends.

Make sure you have looked at their Immigration Grade Cards before you call so you know whether to take a stern tone or a praising tone.

What will give power to the phone calls is when the Senators see that this is not just a one-day or one-week (or even one-month) phenomenon orchestrated by a single group but a continuing onslaught on their offices until they fix the immigration problem.

As to the faxes: Yes, faxes will tend to be thrown away before any Senator sees them. But offices check to see the subject of the fax and the position taken. Most keep a scoresheet of which side the faxes come in on. Many offices send form letters to constituents based on the position taken. And some offices skim through the faxes looking especially at P.S. messages and for something to pass on to higher staffers.

It is an imperfect system for wielding influence, but we know it makes a difference.

N0TES FROM YOU ABOUT TODAY'S VISITS AND PHONE CALLS
Hello Roy, seven talk radio shows contacted within the last hour. I will also be at the Senate offices this morning morning and will email you an account of what transpired.

----------------Sheri Steadman, Phoenix region, Arizona

Dear NumbersUSA, I will try to sandwich a visit to my Senators in between other meetings. In talking to people in person and over the internet this weekend I am finding the most effective arguments to be:

Major layoffs at GM and other firms.

Katrina and other issues affecting blacks.

Affirmative action. Under current laws every illegal Hispanic who gets a green card immediately gets affirmative action preference.

And this one needs to be used with caution - comparison with Israel. I have found it useful to say "If a border fence is morally wrong, why does Israel have one? Why is the US taxpayer paying for that instead of a fence at our own borders? Why don't Palestinians have as much right to live in Jerusalem as Mexicans have to live in Los Angeles?" Certain people REALLY get angry when you say this - and then they bang the door and leave. Literally or metaphorically.

----------Pat Lamken

Roy, because of the last of the Final four ball games today, this is not a good day to visit downtown Indianapolis. also we had a storm last night and some streets are closed because glass was blown out of one of the buildings.

I will get there one day this week but not today.

You are doing SO GREAT!!!
We Are Strong Because We Are Many!

------------John

Yes, if you cannot go to offices today, for goodness sakes go Tuesday or Wednesday. We are trying to make an especially strong showing today at one time, but a visit in the offices any day is powerful.

Roy, here is a very sobering scientific point that I have been using in correspondence with various representatives that puts them in a position that they are not able to defend.

FOOD, LAND, POPULATION and the U.S. ECONOMY
by David Pimentel of Cornell University and
Mario Giampietro Istituto of Nazionale della Nutrizione, Rome

KEY FINDINGS

At the present growth rate of 1.1% per year, the U.S. population will double to more than half a billion people within the next 60 years. It is estimated that approximately one acre of land is lost due to urbanization and highway construction alone for every person added to the U.S. population.

This means that only 0.6 acres of farmland would be available to grow food for each American in 2050, as opposed to the 1.8 acres per capita available today. At least 1.2 acres per person is required in order to maintain current American dietary standards. Food prices are projected to increase 3 to 5-fold within this period.

If present population growth, domestic food consumption and topsoil loss trends continue, the U.S. will most likely cease to be a food exporter by approximately 2025 because food grown in the U.S. will be needed for domestic purposes.

Since food exports earn $40 billion for the U.S. annually, the loss of this income source would result in an even greater increase in America's trade deficit.

Considering that America is the world's largest food exporter, the future survival of millions of people around the world may also come into question if food exports from the U.S. were to cease.

---------------Lee Daniels, Santa Barbara, CA

I am a business owner with some sixty employees and numerous legal immigrants. Why not just suggest that eleven million citizens and businesses stop paying their taxes and then ask for amnesty. See how far the Senate and House are willing to go to allow American citizens to break the law. Illegal aliens, even my Irish cohorts, should be DEPORTED, NOT REWARDED.
--------------Tom McGowan

I think it is important for American citizens to add to the talking points with their Senators that “We the PEOPLE” aren’t allowed to pick and choose what laws we follow. We are in the position of being arrested for violation of laws…having our homes seized for non-payment of taxes….etc. So, why should illegal aliens be allowed to violate the laws of our nation? We are once again being bamboozled by ELECTION year legislation when there are enough laws that could be enforced and simply aren’t being enforced. This whole notion of “Homeland Security” was that it would add protection to the legal citizen. Let’s just take the money from that other band aid legislation and put it toward border security.
--------------M Beers, Fayetteville, AR

For what it's worth, I already sent a Thank You email to Sen. Allen, one of my Senators in Va, for his remarkable stand Sunday on "This Week". Blew me away!! Wish Warner had even HALF of Allen's integrity. Planning to phone Warner's office today.

Don't know of this is pertinent, but haven't seen it being mentioned anywhere else so here it is for your evaluation. The "business interests" and the Senators they've [ bought I'm sorry> influenced, and President Bush, keep harping about how beneficial the illegals are to our economy. What I want to know is, if businesses increased wages enough to attract domestic workers, and the domestic workers spent their money HERE instead of sending most of it to Mexico, how beneficial might That be to our economy? And how much tax savings/tax revenue might we realize by getting millions of our domestic workers off of relief or welfare, and paying taxes?

Thanks for all that you folks are doing. Wish I didn't have a medical disability so I could help more with both activism and donations.

--------------Dave Overstreet, Bedford VA

I am taking a letter from Texans for Immigration Reform, Inc. (on our letterhead) expressing our wishes that Senator Cornyn please consider the growth of population with this massive influx of immigration, legal and illegal, and ask if he has determined the optimum population for the United States. The whole policy appears to be a giant pyramid scheme of bringing more and more in with no regard to the density of population

The letter will also express the favoritism to Mexico which gets far more immigrants than any other country and it is a cause for much resentment.

-----------------Louise Whiteford, President, Texans for Immigration Reform, Inc.

Here are some additional talking points that our Capitol Hill chief of staff, Van Esser, tossed at me to give you to use:

  • Federal law mandates that hospital emergency rooms treat any person who seeks care. The Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) found, in 2004, that annual costs to treat uninsured illegal aliens run to approximately $2.2 billion. Recent Federal efforts to reimburse hospitals for uncompensated care notwithstanding, recovering unpaid costs has been exceptionally difficult and has caused the ruin of numerous healthcare facilities. According to a report in the Spring 2005 issue of the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, 84 hospitals in California alone are closing as a direct consequence of the rising number of illegal aliens and their non-reimbursed tax on the system.

  • According to the Pew Hispanic Center, only five percent of illegal aliens from Mexico were unemployed before they unlawfully came to the United States, so gainful employment doesn’t appear to be the driving force behind illegal immigration. However, the Bureau of Labor Statistics puts the level of unemployment among the 12 million American adults who do not have a high school diploma – most of whom are competing with the illegal aliens for low-wage, low-skill jobs – at nearly nine percent.

  • In 2004, an estimated 27 percent of the federal prison population was comprised of illegal aliens, though illegal aliens account for about 4 percent of the overall U.S. population. GAO found the cost to the federal prisons is an estimated $1.2 billion for 2004.

    MOST IMPORTANTLY, THE CENTER FOR IMMIGRATION STUDIES FOUND THAT ALL OF THE INCREDIBLE COSTS OF ILLEGAL ALIENS WOULD SKYROCKET BY TENS OF BILLIONS OF DOLLARS A YEAR IF THE ILLEGAL ALIENS WERE GIVEN LEGAL STATUS.

    The reason is that once illegal aliens become legal, they have access to far more government services and benefits.
    • U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services is under fire following news reports that fraud is rampant and that the rules governing eligibility for immigration status are being ignored. And these are the people we expect to keep tabs on who stays – and takes jobs, money, and resources away from American citizens – and who goes?

    • The Social Security system will worsen, not improve, under an amnesty. These low-income workers are unlikely to pay enough in payroll taxes to support current beneficiaries. When amnestied workers retire, they will collect far more in Social Security payments than they ever paid into the system.

    • Estimates suggest it would cost $5 billion to install triple fence covering the entire 2,000 miles of the Southwestern border. That cost is much less than the economic cost of illegal immigration to California alone for one year. When Sen. Jon Kyl (R-AZ) recently asked Sen. Diane Feinstein (D-CA) how effective the fence has been in California, she said it was so effective that it forced most of the illegal aliens to cross through Arizona.

    • Past amnesties for illegal aliens have facilitated terrorism. Mahmud Abouhalima, a leader of the 1993 Trade Center bombing, was legalized as a seasonal agricultural worker as part of the 1986 amnesty. After legalizing he was able to travel abroad, including several trips to Afghanistan, where he received the training he used in the bombing.

    • More than 600,000 state and local law enforcement officers already come into contact with illegal aliens every day so we must make greater use of them in this crisis. The problem is that many are unsure of their authority and hence do nothing. Plus, the officers who do arrest such aliens, and then contact federal immigration officials, are frequently told to release the aliens because of a lack of federal personnel to process them or facilities to detain them.

    • The House-passed bill does not target churches and aid providers as some have claimed. Broad language prohibiting the encouragement of illegal immigration has always existed in the alien smuggling statute and these amendments do not change that. The same is true of transportation. Prosecutorial discretion has always been exercised to avoid any gray areas, and the Department of Justice is unaware of any effort by federal prosecutors to use the statute in the manner claimed by some critics.

    • Temporary-worker programs are often portrayed as a legal and humane alternative to unauthorized migration. But they fail to acknowledge that the last major Mexico-US temporary worker program, the so-called Bracero program, actually was the initiator and accelerator of today's large-scale unauthorized migration. 4.9 million Mexicans were apprehended during the Bracero years.

    • The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 made it illegal for an employer to knowingly hire or employ illegal aliens. Employers also must check the identity and work eligibility documents of all new hires. Unfortunately, the Department of Homeland Security rarely enforces this law anymore and, when it does, imposes minimal penalties. By way of illustration, Immigration and Customs Enforcement issued only three Notices of Intent to Fine employers and made only 159 worksite enforcement criminal arrests in fiscal year 2004 (down from 417 and 2,849, respectively, in fiscal 1999).

    • Most current proposals involve some form of "legalization" to "clear the slate" of about 12 million unauthorized residents, usually via a gradual process by which unlawful residents can earn legal immigrant status by doing farm or other work. Such policies have a dismal recent history. In 1987-88, 2.8 million unauthorized migrants obtained US legal status. Yet despite this massive legalization, the farm labor market in California again is dominated by unauthorized workers.

    • H.R. 4437 would finally mandate that every employer in the United States use the federal Internet/phone verification system that quickly and easily determines if a new hire is legally eligible to work here. Currently called the Basic Pilot program, this system for verifying Social Security numbers would prevent most illegal aliens from getting jobs with legitimate employers. While no single enforcement measure would stop all illegal immigration, this is the single-most important solution to rectifying our nation’s half-hearted effort to tackle the problem.

    • There are clear ways to get illegals to go back home without mass deportation. We must focus on interior enforcement, rather than amnesty.

    • The Senate Judiciary Committee bill will entice millions of people to come to America illegally knowing that eventually we'll give in and let them stay. This is exactly what has happened with amnesties and guest worker programs in the past.

    • Proponents of the Senate Judiciary Committee bill claim it doesn't reward illegal aliens for breaking the law, but that is exactly what the bill does. It's almost like a get-out-of-jail-free card. They have to wait a few years and pay a fine. And they don't even have to leave the country. That's a big-time reward.

    • 14 Million Americans cannot find a full-time job. Why are Senators pushing for a massive guestworker program?

    • The US Citizenship & Immigration Services of DHS has not yet dealt with the 500 claims of criminal misconduct against its employees, including espionage and acceptance of bribes. I think most Americans would agree that this is not the right time to create a massive guestworker program to help illegal aliens gain legal status.

    • I understand all non-citizens are supposed to pass through an exit-entry system anywhere in the US but that it hasn't been put in place yet. How can the government run a guestworker program if it doesn’t know who is entering and leaving the country?


    Here are some additional talking points that our Capitol Hill chief legislative analyst Mark Wills sent over to me:
    • There is no such thing as a “temporary” worker.

    • Without significant immigration reforms, not only will the population grow, but stores of nonrenewable resources – like wildlife habitat and open space – will diminish.

    • Reducing current immigration levels range would be a dramatic step toward a stabilized, sustainable population for there would be less pollution, less sprawl, less congestion, and with a tighter job market, affluence would be more widespread throughout all levels of society.

    • The Federal Trade Commission reports that approximately 12 million Americans have been the victim of identity theft. Although there are no firm estimates on how many cases involve illegal aliens, it is assumed that hundreds of thousands of Americans have unknowingly “loaned” their Social Security numbers to illegal aliens. Experts believe that the average victim of illegal alien-based identity theft sees his/her Social Security numbers shared approximately 30 times.

    • Most visitors from Mexico and Canada – not surprisingly, the two nations from which the lion’s share (about 78 percent) of visitors come (as well the highest and fourth-highest numbers of illegal aliens, respectively) – are exempted from enrolling in either the entry or exit components of the US-VISIT tracking system – and DHS has shown no intention to ever require that these visitors be enrolled.

    • The misguided policy of “catch-and-release” allows “Other Than Mexicans” (OTMs) apprehended near the border being released on their own recognizance pending a deportation hearing, provided they have no felony convictions and are not considered to pose a threat to national security. However, only about 15 percent of these OTMs show up for their hearings. In most of these cases, unfortunately, DHS has no further contact with the alien and does not ensure that the person leaves the country, which then allows the alien to blend into his/her community as they feel little fear of being found out by a hapless DHS.

    • By creating a new “temporary” guestworker program and artificially increasing the supply of workers, big business has no incentive to raise wages, enhance benefits, or better working conditions for such workers. This artificial inflation of labor supply also tends to remove much of business’ incentive to innovate, whereas a tighter labor market is more likely to modernize as to be more efficient and effective.

      GOOD LUCK,

      -- ROY

104 posted on 04/03/2006 8:57:53 AM PDT by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: blackie

Excellent post!


105 posted on 04/03/2006 6:44:55 PM PDT by lakey (Politicians thrive on chaos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson