Skip to comments.
Are drinkers raising their glasses to the smoking ban? (Scotland)
The Scotsman ^
| Sunday, 2nd April 2006
| ANNA MILLAR, RICHARD GRAY AND ARTHUR MACMILLAN
Posted on 04/02/2006 12:28:18 PM PDT by SittinYonder
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
To: nothingnew
FREEEEEEEDOMMM!!!!!! That was then, unfortunately this is Scotland now
21
posted on
04/02/2006 6:34:38 PM PDT
by
qam1
(There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
To: TaxRelief
Unintended consequences are a beeyatch.
Just wait 'til the first massacre at a smokeasy.
To: gondramB
What? The government can dispatch reporters.... I believe "Scotland on Sunday" is a newspaper but I could be wrong.
23
posted on
04/02/2006 6:43:03 PM PDT
by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(Sign up to donate monthly and you will be automatically entered in our "Win a Bear Hug Contest")
To: SheLion
Meanwhile, it was reported that a woman was removed from a jury at Glasgow High Court after she was allegedly overheard saying she would take a harsher view of the accused, if there was nowhere in the court for her to smoke.Note to self: Use this to escape future jury duty, although my anger would be targeted toward judge and prosecutors.
To: SittinYonder
Alright, everyone. Repeat after me. Right arm up at a 45 degree angle, palm flat. In English "Hail, Victory". "Hail, Victory". "Hail, Victory".
25
posted on
04/02/2006 6:56:21 PM PDT
by
Hardastarboard
(HEY - Billy Joe! You ARE an American Idiot!)
To: TaxRelief
They've groped your children?
26
posted on
04/02/2006 6:56:38 PM PDT
by
Pan_Yans Wife
("Death is better, a milder fate than tyranny. "--Aeschylus)
To: Pan_Yans Wife
Fortunately they are usually only groping each other.
27
posted on
04/02/2006 7:11:02 PM PDT
by
TaxRelief
(Wal-Mart: Keeping my family on-budget since 1993.)
To: SittinYonder
If they ban it in my area, I will only go to bars to play shows there. If and when I quit smoking, I will go to bars, since apparently bars in those areas only want nonsmokers as clients. These bans stand because smokers keep going to the bars. I will not be purchasing drinks at any nonsmoking bar as a smoker. If more smokers would follow this policy, the bans would be short lived indeed.
28
posted on
04/02/2006 7:19:32 PM PDT
by
mysterio
To: SittinYonder
This is the beginning of the end for all personal freedom in Scotland, it appears. The line between private and public property has been erased. Coming soon to America.....
29
posted on
04/02/2006 7:20:14 PM PDT
by
383rr
(Those who choose security over liberty deserve neither- GUN CONTROL=SLAVERY)
To: mysterio
These bans stand because smokers keep going to the bars.
Yep. And restaurants. And amusement parks. And (fill in the blank.) They just keep bending over and taking another inch between the buttocks and say thank you very much, I know I should quit anyway, and I'm afraid of being arrested or fined. 30% of the country's citizenry is a powerful force indeed. Or rather, COULD be-if the majority of smokers had any balls. We outnumber gun owners by how much, do you think? They back off on them because they stick together, and get laws passed, or get rhinos and cRATS voted out. Think about this...IF smokers had any balls or organization;;;;and IF we all contributed say-FIVE BUCKS a month-we could literally buy ANY election in the U.S. including perhaps the presidency. And that's if only half of that 30% were to contribute.
30
posted on
04/02/2006 10:19:37 PM PDT
by
The Foolkiller
(BSXL* The year the NFL became irrelevant..)
To: The Foolkiller
I for one am tired of edicts from the ruling class telling us what fresh, steaming pile of statism that we desperately need. Notice that each edict gives our cancerous government even more money and power. And as usaul, tyranny is greeted with thunderous applause.
Where I live, they picked the incremental route to an all out ban. We now have complex rules that certain resteraunts may allow smoking while others may not. In two year's time, we will probably be throwing out the "confusing" policy in favor of an all out ban in resteraunts, with bars to follow soon after.
31
posted on
04/02/2006 10:24:55 PM PDT
by
mysterio
To: SittinYonder
thx for the ping.
I too am stunned at the docile reception the Scots have had to this intrusion upon their private property, let alone the court's reaction to a juror/smoker merely stating her desire to have a puff, and the potential repercussions of PROHIBITION!
32
posted on
04/03/2006 12:55:48 AM PDT
by
Don W
(Stoneage man survived thousands of years of bitter-cold ice. Modern man WILLsurvive global warming.)
To: SittinYonder
The left: "For your own good we'll rule over you."

The right: 
!!!!FREEEEDOMMMM!!!!!
33
posted on
04/03/2006 1:13:51 AM PDT
by
ran15
To: SittinYonder
Are drinkers raising their glasses to the smoking ban? Some day they will prohibit drinking alcohol in bars.
Freedom on the march!
34
posted on
04/04/2006 2:27:53 AM PDT
by
A. Pole
(Solzhenitsyn:"Live Not By Lies" www.columbia.edu/cu/augustine/ arch/solzhenitsyn/livenotbylies.html)
To: SittinYonder
There is NO BAN on smoking in your own home.
It was merely a stupid comment/suggestion by a congenital idiot we sadly have as a minister...
It didnt make the headlines here and nobody has taken any notice of it as a result,dont worry...
To: the scotsman
36
posted on
04/24/2006 7:46:35 PM PDT
by
SittinYonder
(That's how I saw it, and see it still.)
To: SittinYonder
Smokers who continue to give money to the bars are more responsible than the nannies who demanded the legislation.
37
posted on
04/24/2006 7:48:10 PM PDT
by
mysterio
To: SittinYonder
Thats England.
Here,it has been 'suggested' but the NHS has no Scots legal right to enforce such a 'right' in a private home.
In fact the English one is illegal too I believe...
To: the scotsman
Thats England
LOL ... I get so accustomed to skipping over place names in articles in the Scotsman (since they mean nothing to me) that I never looked to see where it actually was, just assuming it was Scotland because of the source.
Thanks for setting me straight, although my general point (which is that nationalized healthcare leads to a loss of liberty) remains the same.
39
posted on
04/24/2006 8:12:18 PM PDT
by
SittinYonder
(That's how I saw it, and see it still.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson