Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RS

The link works fine for me. Here's the section (cut and paste from the link I gave).


22 posted on 04/02/2006 11:40:39 AM PDT by delacoert (imperat animus corpori, et paretur statim: imperat animus sibi, et resistitur. -AUGUSTINI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: delacoert

Very strange then that 4437 has 274(a)(1)

(A) which like the old 277 addresses illegal entry

... yet adds

(B) which adds entry at other then a designated port

(C) which adds "residing" to cover those that are not covered in (A) & (B)

(D) which adds "transports" to cover those that are not covered in (A) & (B) & (C)

(E) which adds "concealment" to cover those that are not covered in (A) & (B) & (C) & (D)

(F) which makes all of these a crime even on the high seas, in anticipation that the person just might be seeking illegal entry


ALL of these addtional ones were NOT covered by the existing law, and looking at simply 277 are NOT illegal.


29 posted on 04/02/2006 12:18:36 PM PDT by RS ("I took the drugs because I liked them and I found excuses to take them, so I'm not weaseling.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson