Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/01/2006 7:35:47 PM PST by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Temple Owl

ping


2 posted on 04/01/2006 7:36:00 PM PST by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tribune7

If this doesn't work, bring forth a bill that would require voters to dip their fingers in bottles of purple ink.


4 posted on 04/01/2006 7:37:42 PM PST by D-Chivas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tribune7
Pretty soon, due to an amendment to the Patriot Act cosponsored by Diane Fienstein and Hillary Clinton and a few others including Republicans, everyone who wishes to purchase pseudoephedrine cold pills (Sudofed) will need to show picture ID and sign a book.


But not to vote. No picture ID to vote, just to buy cold pills.
5 posted on 04/01/2006 7:39:53 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tribune7

The blizzard story is great. Same happened here in the late 70s. We buckled down and got er done. Some areas didn't have power for over a month. Never heard a peep out of jimmah or jesse.


7 posted on 04/01/2006 7:53:54 PM PST by Eagles6 (Dig deeper, more ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tribune7
"And just why don’t democrats like the idea of voters identifying themselves? Simple. Because the Democratic Party is the party of voter fraud." -- Neal Boortz
8 posted on 04/01/2006 8:16:48 PM PST by FreeKeys ("Nothing brings out the lower traits of human nature like office seeking." -- Rutherford B. Hayes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tribune7

I never have understood how these creeps get away with making this argument. Harder to vote? Cry me a freaking river! What's further amazing is that these people constantly yammer about how Republicans steal elections when they're the ones so unwilling to ID who is voting. The press seems equally hypocritical (gee, what else is new?)

Oh, another interesting little tidbit from the article:

"According to Rep. James P. Moran, (D-Va.), "Over one in seven fur garments sold in the U.S. are not legally required to be labeled." So you may end up wearing fur made from dog or cat.

An 18-month undercover investigation by the Humane Society of the United States revealed that millions of cats and dogs are being killed each year in China for fur trim on coats, hats and other items.

I suggest to our readers that they also be very careful about buying any canned meat products imported from China. One never knows, does one?"


9 posted on 04/01/2006 8:18:32 PM PST by CheyennePress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tribune7
I don't know how anyone can oppose voter ID with a straight face. It is obvious to the dumbest that no voter ID is intended to facilitate voter fraud. Although I am not in favor of federal laws in general, in this case it is too important for the control of the federal government not to have voter ID and traceability of those who vote.

The only chance the left has is voter fraud and they use it extensively. That is the biggest part of their support of illegals in this country. They intend to transform criminals into Democrat voters. It must be stopped somehow.

10 posted on 04/01/2006 8:20:59 PM PST by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done, needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tribune7
Eddie says that's asking too much...I think I saw a poll done about the same time Eddie was taking his stand which showed that a pretty good majority actually wanted voters to have to show some type of identification - the Guv might rethink this pretty quick.....
13 posted on 04/01/2006 8:36:39 PM PST by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tribune7

No voter ID required but we must disqualify or not count as many military ballots as possible because you know how they vote. Right, Eddie?

Dirt bag par excellence.


14 posted on 04/01/2006 8:44:20 PM PST by headstamp (Nothing lasts forever, Unless it does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tribune7

Democrats everywhere know that positively IDing people at the polling place will result in a precipitous drop in Democrat votes cast, while not at all impacting the number of real people who show up at the polls.

Inner city turnouts over 90%. Actual observed turnouts between 10-20%. Come ON, who is fooling who?


15 posted on 04/01/2006 8:58:13 PM PST by AbeKrieger (I miss President Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tribune7
Fast Eddie knows it would be hard to get ID's for all the dead Philadelphia voters who vote for the democrats; not to mention the winos who show up to vote multiple times for those who might not be able to make it to the polls.

You should have seen the black female from Philadelphia in the PA house pissing and moaning about what what a travesty this was going to be. She acted so stupid on the floor she was an embarrassment!
17 posted on 04/01/2006 10:15:29 PM PST by Herakles (Liberals are stone stupid and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tribune7

Real Americans, who consider their ONE vote a very precious thing, believe that IT SHOULD BE HARD TO VOTE. Maggots like "Fast Eddie" rely on voter fraud to get elected so it's easy to understand why he needs to keep the voting process easy. Since he relies on morons who call themselves DemocRATS, it's tough enough getting those pinheads to vote correctly even one time. If you ask your average DemocRAT to identify themself, most of them haven't got a clue who the hell they are.


18 posted on 04/01/2006 10:41:42 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (Sacrificing unity and national identity for "diversity" and "multiculturalism" is a really dumb idea)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tribune7

Under the bill, each voter would have had to show election workers a form of identification such as a driver's license; a U.S. passport; a student, employee or government ID; a county voter-registration card; a firearm permit; a current utility bill; or a current bank statement, paycheck or government check.

Eddie says that's asking too much

Well, how else is he supposed to beat Lynn Swann?
23 posted on 04/02/2006 1:36:07 AM PST by jennyp (WHAT I'M READING NOW: Getting to Yes by Fisher & Ury)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tribune7; All
Simpler solution:


24 posted on 04/02/2006 3:26:46 AM PDT by backhoe (Just an Old Keyboard Cowboy, Ridin' the Trakball into the Dawn of Information)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tribune7
Thing is, dead voters can only be removed from PA voter rolls by presentation of a death cert. For sure, that is the very first thing the bereaved family is going to think of. Also if someone moves and then dies later in a different location they will never be removed from the voter rolls in PA.

I have worked with our local voter registration list and there are more people elligible to vote in our township in the Poconos than there are people living here. The folks with second homes here make no bones about voting twice. This disgusts me. This is a kind of arrogance and disrespect of our form of government and fellow man that is encouraged by Rendell.

25 posted on 04/02/2006 3:42:33 AM PDT by finnsheep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson