Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pcottraux
But I think striking them (without a land invasion) from the air will be the only thing we'll be able to do.

It is unlikely in the extreme that even that will be done. And as far as Israel's doing it is concerned, with the election of a Kadima led government, that's out of the picture as well. No, it looks like the threat of "atomic ayatollahs" is going to be countered by "nuclear Riyadh", with the House of Saud being given the technology, by Pakistan, and with our approval.

Will this gambit work? Perhaps it might, but work, or not, it just does *not* give me "a warm and fuzzy feeling"...

37 posted on 04/01/2006 4:51:13 PM PST by infowarrior (The GOP runs the US, the Dems run their mouths... Freeper HardStarboard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: infowarrior
You're right about Israel. The chances of them being involved are now highly unlikely. Nevertheless, the plans of a U.S.-led strike are alright in place and the buildup has begun.

The danger of the Iranians getting the bomb is not just a dangerous arms race across the Middle East that ends all stability. The likelihood of the Iranians actually using the bomb is too great to let happen. The chance of them hitting Iraq with it is too real a possibility.

47 posted on 04/01/2006 5:00:47 PM PST by pcottraux (It's pronounced "P. Coe-troe.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson