Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: infowarrior

....can't speak for the other services but USAFA adapted this policy in the late 60's after it was learned that
some captive pilots were being executed in North Viet Nam as a result of saying nothing...it was understood that any statements made under duress under such circumstances were invalid and disavowable


155 posted on 04/01/2006 5:30:25 PM PST by Armigerous ( Non permitte illegitimi te carborundum- "Don't let the bastards grind you down")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]


To: Armigerous
....can't speak for the other services but USAFA adapted this policy in the late 60's after it was learned that some captive pilots were being executed in North Viet Nam as a result of saying nothing...it was understood that any statements made under duress under such circumstances were invalid and disavowable

Interesting... As I said, *my* experiences were totally different. In SERE in the early 70's (1973, to be exact), the Army had a policy which was The US Fighting Man's Code, adopted just post Korean War, which emphasized not even giving the *appearance* of cooperating with the enemy. I, of course, don't hold civilians to the standard set forth in the Code, so it doesn't apply to Ms Carroll at all, but your statement defintely caught my eye...

the infowarrior

157 posted on 04/01/2006 6:01:56 PM PST by infowarrior (The GOP runs the US, the Dems run their mouths... Freeper HardStarboard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson