It's all about tearing down the family for the purpose of destroying America.
So now, people who support plural marriage are for the destruction of the country? I suppose it's folks like you that keep me investing in the Reynolds Corp...la
Ideally there'd be no divorce and no young widows with children.
But there is.
And frequently those women with children become dependent on the State.
What is so terrible about a man accepting the woman and her family?
In this culture it is not permitted primarily because women are jelous. Forget that there are those who could participate VOLUNTARILY and for whom there could be many significant benefits.
But the shallow opponents will focus on the man and insist it is all about lust. By doing that they hide the fact that they'd prefer to see women with children dependent on the state or charity than to see them become a part of someone's family.
Obviously men who have these jealous wives are not candidates for second wives.
But what about those whose wive consent?
Should the insecurities and jealousies of some dictate life to others?
Yeah, I know...men all claim that its all about women's jelaousy while women all claim that it is about men's lust. All the other arguments are verbal static.