1 posted on
03/31/2006 7:19:44 AM PST by
TomGuy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-36 last
To: TomGuy
Don't get me wrong on this. I do have a solution to dealing with al-Qaeda and the enemies of the United States |
|
84 posted on
03/31/2006 7:53:22 AM PST by
TomGuy
To: TomGuy
really appreciate the heads up your thread provides. thanks
116 posted on
03/31/2006 8:02:54 AM PST by
YaYa123
To: American_Centurion; An.American.Expatriate; ASA.Ranger; ASA Vet; Atigun; bannedfromdu; Beckwith; ...
MI? ......ping
Dog and pony show Alert.
122 posted on
03/31/2006 8:05:17 AM PST by
BIGLOOK
(Order of Battle: Sink or capture as Prize, MS Media)
To: TomGuy
172 posted on
03/31/2006 8:17:55 AM PST by
TomGuy
To: TomGuy
Bruce Fein says has made inquiries of Senators?
What gives him authority or position to be inquiring of Senators?
184 posted on
03/31/2006 8:20:56 AM PST by
TomGuy
To: TomGuy
The US Senate= the Achilles heel of a otherwise near perfect government. The only mistake our Founding Fathers ever made.
206 posted on
03/31/2006 8:27:00 AM PST by
F.J. Mitchell
(It's only those lying SOBs with agendas,who keep telling us there are jobs Americans won't do !)
To: TomGuy
Doesn't look like many Senators gave up their Friday to attend this nonsense.
210 posted on
03/31/2006 8:28:36 AM PST by
TomGuy
To: TomGuy
Graham is shaking his finger.
[This is getting serious. lol]
Now, it becomes a two-fer (2 fingers)
224 posted on
03/31/2006 8:32:44 AM PST by
TomGuy
To: TomGuy; All
Can anyone advise of where this hearing process leads? When the hearing is over what happens next....do they decided to vote on whether or not to censure?
TIA
To: TomGuy
What a bunch of total BS this is! Didn't five former FISA judges testify to the SJC that President Bush was within his Constitutional authority in regards to the surveillance program? Ugh!! WHat a waste of taxpayer $$
248 posted on
03/31/2006 8:54:29 AM PST by
blinachka
(Vechnaya Pamyat Daddy... xoxo)
To: TomGuy
Is that it?
Not even a vote?
So the whole thing was an exercise in futility and stupidity.
288 posted on
03/31/2006 9:26:03 AM PST by
TomGuy
To: TomGuy
Does anyone else think this whole "censure" dust up (that seemed to come from thin air one day) is something of a pre-emptive strike on the part of Feingold, et.al.? I say that because last I read, DOJ was closing in on the leaks on the Secret Prisons and the NSA Program to the media, and they basically asserted they wouldn't have to look farther than the Senate. So is this a way for Feingold, Durbin, Rockefeller, etc., to try to minimize the damage THAT investigation might bring? Just a thought...
To: TomGuy
I know the GOP is making sure this moves forward to committee to capitalize on Feingold's idiotic blunder, but what's the game plan? Is the committee going to just force a vote on a censure recommendation to put the 'rats in the hot seat, or are they going to do an "aw, shucks... I don't think the President should be censured, but I think the whole Senate should get the chance to decide" so they can keep kicking Feingold around a little longer?
313 posted on
03/31/2006 10:36:36 AM PST by
kevkrom
("...no one has ever successfully waged a war against stupidity" - Orson Scott Card)
To: TomGuy
Because the Senate has nothing ELSE to debate!
315 posted on
03/31/2006 10:40:10 AM PST by
newzjunkey
(Fellow 50th Congressional Freepers: Don't fall for Bilbray!)
To: TomGuy
Feingold is just trying to get a resolution of guilt of the President to distract from the almost guarantee indictments of the leaker's of the program, ie; Durbin, Rockerfeller.
334 posted on
03/31/2006 12:48:18 PM PST by
tobyhill
(The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
To: All
CBS Radio's newsbreak at the top of the hour started with this:
"President Bush was compared to President Nixon in a hearing on Capitol Hill today..."
338 posted on
03/31/2006 2:04:52 PM PST by
mwp99
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-36 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson