he was right then, and he is right now. And he will crush his critics in history.
1 posted on
03/30/2006 7:35:19 PM PST by
pissant
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
To: pissant
Consider the implications of the neoconservative arguments. Mr. Mugabe, the crazed ruler of Zimbabwe has made a mockery of democracy in his country, impoverished her citizens and killed his opponents. Zimbabwe is smack in the middle of a region that could certainly benefit from an infusion of democracy and it is unarguably true that a choice between living in Mugabe's Zimbabwe and Husseins Iraq would be no choice at all. Still, no one has seriously proposed sending U.S. troops into that unfortunate nation to rescue her citizens from the tyrant who runs the place.
A major difference that he overlooks is that Mugabe is essentially powerless beyond his own border. Hussein was sitting on trillions of dollars of oil and could export terrorism by the barrel.
70 posted on
03/31/2006 8:21:49 AM PST by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: pissant
On this issue hopefully. The rest is out of the question.
72 posted on
03/31/2006 8:27:08 AM PST by
Protagoras
(The world is full of successful idiots and genius failures.)
To: pissant
85 posted on
03/31/2006 10:12:56 AM PST by
Tribune7
To: pissant
The only thing we or the MSM have ever known for sure about the WMD's is that we do not know where they are PERIOD. Why the left has been allowed to translate don't know where to never existed is baffling. Repeat a lie often enough and it becomes the truth is the operating system they are so
good at. That systems has been infected with a powerful virus, FR and the blogisphere.
93 posted on
03/31/2006 6:10:58 PM PST by
SAWTEX
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson