Senate Works Toward Lobbying Changes

AP on Yahoo ^ | 3/29/06 | Jim Abrams -ap

[NormsRevenge]

WASHINGTON - The Senate moved Wednesday to approve the first major change in lobbying and ethics rules in more than a decade, the latest effort by Congress to restore its plummeting reputation with voters before the fall elections.

Under the bill expected to pass by a wide margin, senators would no longer be able to accept gifts or meals from lobbyists and lobbyists would be required to reveal more information about their contacts with lawmakers.

But the bill, to the chagrin of many pushing for more fundamental change, does not ban privately funded travel. Nor would it establish a new office in the Senate to investigate ethical violations.

The Senate on Wednesday defeated a proposal by Sen. Russ Feingold (news, bio, voting record), D-Wis., to extend the gift and meal ban to include people working at companies hiring lobbyists. "We ought to just stop the practice of dining out at the expense of others," he said. But opponents argued that the ban was overly restrictive, and it was defeated 68-30.

Both House and Senate leaders have made lobbying and ethics reform a priority this year after the influence-peddling scandal involving former lobbyist Jack Abramoff and the conviction of former Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham, R-Calif., on bribery charges further eroded popular opinion of Congress.

"We're dealing with a reality here that public confidence in Congress is very low, it is perilously low," said Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee Chairman Susan Collins, R-Maine, a leading sponsor of the legislation.

But many were dissatisfied with the final product, saying it didn't go far enough to cut unhealthy ties between lawmakers and lobbyists. The Senate bill does not ban privately funded trips, and on Tuesday the Senate defeated a priority of clean government groups: a proposal to establish an independent Office of Public Integrity to carry out investigations of possible ethics violations by senators.

Such investigations are now done by the Senate ethics committee, composed of three Republicans and three Democrats, and members of the panel led the effort to reject the new office, proposed by Collins and Sen. Joe Lieberman, D-Conn. The measure was defeated 67-30.

Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., a proponent of independent investigations, said it was necessary because currently the work of Congress "doesn't really matter because the American people perceive the entire ethics system, House and Senate, to be broken."

But Senate ethics committee members said their panel is doing its job — unlike the House ethics committee, which has been paralyzed by partisan battles. The new office, which under the Collins proposal would still cede ultimate authority on punitive actions to the Senate committee, means "more bureaucracy and a more belabored process," said Senate ethics committee member Tim Johnson, D-S.D.

Common Cause President Chellie Pingree expressed disappointment in the Senate vote. "Even as the Justice Department investigates possible corruption of at least half a dozen members of Congress, the Senate today is refusing to acknowledge that Congress — in the eyes of the public — has failed to police itself."

The Senate approved, by 84-13, a proposal offered by Sens. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., and Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, to end the practice of secret "holds" in which senators can single-handedly block action on legislation. It would require a senator taking advantage of this common procedure to publish a notice of the objection in the Congressional Record within three days.

"It's time to force these objections out of the shadows and into the sunshine," Wyden said.

The Senate lobbying bill would ban accepting meals from lobbyists, require lobbyists to make quarterly reports of their contacts with lawmakers, and force lawmakers to wait two years before accepting jobs lobbying Congress, up from the current one-year moratorium.

The bill also sets up a procedure by which lawmakers can try to eliminate from legislation those earmarks, or specific projects, that often are inserted without the knowledge or vote of other members.

The House has yet to take up similar legislation emphasizing greater disclosure of lobbyist activity.

But House Republicans stepped up their call for a measure reining in outside political groups that are permitted to accept donations of unlimited size. Rep. Eric Cantor (news, bio, voting record), R-Va., said the proposal would close a loophole that exists despite enactment of a law in 2002 banning federal office holders and candidates as well as the political parties from accepting unlimited donations.

Republicans earlier made clear they hope to reduce the clout of these groups, arguing that Democrats benefit disproportionately from their existence.

___

The Senate lobbying reform bill is S. 2349.

___

On the Net:

Congress: http://thomas.loc.gov/

[bmwcyle]

They aren't going to work late into the night to finish this? /sarcasm

[Always Right]

But the bill, to the chagrin of many pushing for more fundamental change, does not ban privately funded travel.

No, we wouldn't want to take any real perks away from our poor Senators.

Nor would it establish a new office in the Senate to investigate ethical violations.

That is understandable, the Senate is way too busy investigating what kind of toilet paper the white house is using.

[JoeFromSidney]

I doubt my congresscritters can be bought for the price of a meal. The problem is that they are usurping powers not granted by the Constitution, and getting paid in campaign contributions.

Get back to the limitations of Article 1, Section 8, and most of the problem disappears. If you can't get extraConstitutional goodies from your congresscritter, there's no point in bribing him.