This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
|
Locked on 03/31/2006 10:37:17 AM PST by Admin Moderator, reason:
.
|
Skip to comments.
Boehner hints a back down on 'amnesty'
The Washington Times ^
| March 29, 2006
| Charles hurt
Posted on 03/29/2006 7:15:28 AM PST by surely_you_jest
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,081-1,100, 1,101-1,120, 1,121-1,140 ... 2,061-2,064 next last
To: NapkinUser
"Mexican officials have been critical of the House bill, particularly an amendment that calls for building nearly 700 miles of fence along the border. The Bush administration supported the House bill, but Mr. Bush told CNN Espanol yesterday that fencing off the [whole] border is "impractical." ![](http://webpages.charter.net/aircover/USAflag.gif)
And he's right. He's supporting the 700 mile fence in the House bill, but noting that we have thousands of miles of border (e.g. coastal) where such fencing would be impractical.
1,101
posted on
03/29/2006 3:25:16 PM PST
by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: onyx
Comment #1,103 Removed by Moderator
To: taxed2death
From
Center for Immigration Studies, December 2005
The 35.2 million immigrants (legal and illegal) living in the country in March 2005 is the highest number ever recorded -- two and a half times the 13.5 million during the peak of the last great immigration wave in 1910.
Between January 2000 and March 2005, 7.9 million new immigrants (legal and illegal) settled in the country, making it the highest five-year period of immigration in American history.
Nearly half of post-2000 arrivals (3.7 million) are estimated to be illegal aliens.
1,104
posted on
03/29/2006 3:26:10 PM PST
by
Reagan Man
(Secure our borders;punish employers who hire illegals;stop all welfare to illegals)
To: Indy Pendance
I wonder how many other old timers are out there, totally disgusted with the way this place changed?I don't remember FR ever being a pro-illegals website. What has changed?
To: Coop
Lame jab back, John L.
Try swinging your pocketbook next time.
To: Deconstructionist
I have browsed this forum for almost four years now. I never bothered to post because the anti-intellectual swarm of Bushbots would consistently stiffle debate. They haven't been been able to get away with it this time, though. They can't hide the stink of this bag of **** amnesty plan. JMO, you are stinking up the place with the big steamy pile above.
1,107
posted on
03/29/2006 3:27:21 PM PST
by
Dane
( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
To: EternalVigilance
Isn't that ugly? Their flag against OURS on OUR soil DEMANDING legal status?
1,108
posted on
03/29/2006 3:27:26 PM PST
by
onyx
(Elections are in November, 06 ---- 08 can wait!)
To: Southack
I noticed upthread that you mentioned the fence in the California sector.
A more pathetic fence it would be hard to imagine.
It's an open invitation to hide and climb.
To: NapkinUser
Interesting findings at that link, thanks.
Asked whether they would favor "allowing illegal immigrants already working in the United States to register as guest workers for a fixed period of time, so that the government could keep track of them," 73% said they "favor"; 23% said "oppose"; 3% don't know.
To: EternalVigilance; Reagan Man
look closely at the sign
To: onyx
To: Southack
There is nothing impractical about fencing off the southern border. There is no engineering obstactle in such a task that we cannot overcome. The only thing lacking is political will. Neither Bush nor the Democrats nor the four RINOs who voted yesterday for amnesty have any desire to control illegal immigration.
The American people overwhelmingly want illegal immigration stopped cold and legal immigration reduced. Unfortunately, our government increasingly listens only to elite opinion, and elite opinion is overwhelmingly in favor of mass immigration.
1,113
posted on
03/29/2006 3:31:46 PM PST
by
Thorin
("I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.")
To: Stellar Dendrite
To: EternalVigilance
ULGY.
Free speech. Times like these....
1,115
posted on
03/29/2006 3:32:56 PM PST
by
onyx
(Elections are in November, 06 ---- 08 can wait!)
To: NapkinUser
It's the whole crowd.Like I said, you want to shut out ANY discussion that doesn't agree with yours.
1,116
posted on
03/29/2006 3:32:59 PM PST
by
Howlin
("It doesn't have a policy. It doesn't need to have a policy. What's the point of a Democratic policy)
To: Coop
"Oh, but how can I, what with me staggering from Shapka's and your witty repertoire?!?" John L., must we remind you of the "ping rule" etiquette?
To: Dog Gone
"as guest workers for a fixed period of time"
For a fixed period of time. Not a path to citizenship in the bill supported by Harry Reid, the democrats on the senate judiciary committee, Sam Brownback, Mike DeWine, John McCain, Lindsey Graham and president Bush.
1,118
posted on
03/29/2006 3:33:40 PM PST
by
NapkinUser
(Secure our borders, no amnesty.)
To: EternalVigilance
UGLY --- typo on other... although ULGY works too.
1,119
posted on
03/29/2006 3:34:20 PM PST
by
onyx
(Elections are in November, 06 ---- 08 can wait!)
To: onyx
ULGY. Free speech. Times like these.... Huh?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,081-1,100, 1,101-1,120, 1,121-1,140 ... 2,061-2,064 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson