Not entirely. Not even close. We don't have a ping list...
| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 03/31/2006 10:37:17 AM PST by Admin Moderator, reason:
. |
Posted on 03/29/2006 7:15:28 AM PST by surely_you_jest
House Majority Leader John A. Boehner refused yesterday to rule out compromising with the Senate to expand the House border security bill to include a guest-worker program or provisions that opponents call "amnesty." "Let's wait and see what the Senate can produce," he told reporters yesterday when asked whether House Republicans would reject the Senate Judiciary Committee's proposal to allow the estimated 12 million illegal aliens now in the U.S. to seek citizenship after paying a fine.
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
You're right then, what bill did the President sign that granted just Amnesty as my original, not addressed to you, question was?
You ask the same totally dishonest question all over again.
Amnesty doesn't have to be a bill. It can simply be refusing to enforce the law, which has been Bush's policy since he was governor of Texas. AN UNENFORCED LAW IS AN AMNESTY.
How many more times are you gonna spam this thread with the same post? We caught it the first time.
Until his owners tell him to stop?
Here: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1605381/posts?page=1003#1003
Facts are to you... like God is to Commies?
What the hell are you talking about? Doing something about it was one of his campaign issues in 2000.
I just don't understand the hatred of Bush over this issue. It seems to even cause convenient memory loss so that you can make false statements with a clean conscience.
Don't hold your breath. The point is to bash Bush, no matter what. Facts don't matter.
Good posts everybody, and big applause to Coop for adding some much needed entertainment in response to the same tired bumpersticker "shoot first then deport them" sloganeering from the glass trailerpark pitchforkers.
Why do I suspect you're full of it?
....but Mr. Bush told CNN Espanol yesterday that fencing off the border is "impractical."
Source
Related source:
Excellent point. Which is why (1) illegals aren't going anywhere; (2) more are coming; (3) based on demographics, the Dems are close to having a permanent majority (starting in 2006?); and (4) look forward to (a) higher taxes & (b) reduced services.
As goes Calif, so goes the nation. The trick is to figure out how to thrive in this environment. It's just a mirror image of what's been going on in Calif for 20 years.
Of course it's an excuse, ANOTHER excuse, to bash President Bush, whose position has not changed since he ran in 2000.
Look at the border towns and check their "elected" US Representatives!
My former Congresswoman was the democrat Susan Davis of San Diego, a border town! She unseated GOP Brian Bilbray and has held the seat ever since.
You'd think, that border towns would elect congress persons who campaign on sealing the vorders etc., but that's not the case.
Much easier to blame POTUS, when in fact, his position has been clear for years.
Coop has entertained us all day. Well, MOST of us.
He's been a sanity island in a sea of sharks or those who have jumped sharks.
"Howlin; COEXERJ145; Coop; sinkspur; Dane; distro.jihad; FreeReign; onyx; Don'tMessWithTexas....."
It's the whole crowd.
We're waiting with bated breath for your words of wisdom!
Build a big nasty border wall.
Give them all amnesty and make them register.
Illegal immigrant income tax at 45%.
75% tax on ALL wire transfers ending in Mexico.
Seize all Mexican oil fields to pay for the illegals.
Oh, if our leaders had any guts....
Not entirely. Not even close. We don't have a ping list...
Is that you Cultural?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.