Democrats Offer National Security Platform

AP / breitbart. ^ | 3/29/06 | LIZ SIDOTI

[newnhdad]

I don't even have to read it..
"We're smart, Bush is stupid. Don't pay attention to our opposition to protecting the country and our desire for open borders, and our lust for failure, death of American troops, retreat and fear of conflict, reliance on French goodwill and the approval of the UN (Useless Nations). We will do a better job than the other guys. We will catch the tallest man in Afghanistan because when he sees that Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi are in charge and ready to write a few strongly worded letters, he'll just surrender. He will because we're smarter.
Anyway we believe Karl Rove has Osama hidden under the White House playing video games and waiting until October to announce his capture" Blah, blah, blah..

When do they think the American people will trust them? Before or after their censure votes and impeachment trials?

[Diana in Wisconsin]

"The bottom line is while this president campaigns against the terrorists, Democrats remain focused on campaigning against this president."

That pretty much sums it up. Dims don't give a rats rump about America.

[mr_hammer]

"Democrats Offer National Security Platform"

What's the punch line? Did I not hear the riddle?

(Sarcasm off)

[Coop]

Next week Teddy Kennedy [hic!] and Bill Clinton [better put some ice on that] will be releasing a joint paper on ethics. ROTFL!

[PigRigger]

The statement lacks specific details of a plan to capture bin Laden, the al-Qaida chief who has evaded U.S. forces in the more than four years since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. But Democrats suggest they will double the number of special forces and add more spies to increase the chances of finding al-Qaida's elusive leader.

They will never understand that capturing Bin Laden will do little in the way of preventing Jihad on the West. Yet, they hold on to this notion as if it is the Holy Grail....

They are clueless; this is not a police operation....we are war!

Perhaps, I humbly suggest, their very first step might be to acknowledge they we are at war to begin with....

[P-40]

"We need a new direction on national security

Will that include rebuilding The Wall? Sorry, your pre-911 plans were criminal in their incompetence.

[Valin]

I see a 60 Minute Special coming up! Or a XXX video.

[Inwoodian]

The last "tough and smart" minority leader before Dingy Harry is kicking around cow pies in the Dakotas.

[Kewlhand`tek]

what's to keep them now from catching bin laden, other than he is dead, Jim.
is it because there are no democrat soldiers? well there are maybe we can consolidate them make them the Democrat Gaurd, they can look for bin laden, protect the rights of detainees....the uses are endless, well and pointless too.

[new yorker 77]

BREAKING NEWS: AP LIES FOR DEMOCRATS.

Followed by a NEW FAKE POLL.

Followed by a DEAD FAILURE REPORT from Iraq.

Future News: In reserve the MSM thesaurus for discussing Election Day results: "unexpected" and "surprising" GOP victories.

[Redleg Duke]

All sorts of rhetoric, damned little substance.

[libertarianPA]

They can say it all they want, but because of who they are, it's just not believable.

That's the problem. They will say it all they want from now until November. And if Republicans, particulary Bush, doesn't demonstrate some act of no-nonsense action (cutting off aid to the Palestinans, continued raids on Iraqi insurgents, striking Iran's nuclear facilities... something eye-popping), then the Dems are going to gain ground on this issue.

Belive me. I'm not buying what they're selling. I think they're the Al Qaida's strongest ally. But perception is reality. And if Bush doesn't fight back and sits there and takes it, they're going to do damage come November.

[Libloather]

Democrats Offer National Security Platform

I've heard they're also working on an evacuation plan for New Orleans just in case the 'big one' hits. Details will be released in early 2011...