Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/28/2006 1:38:58 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: neverdem

Specter exemplifies everything that is wrong with the GOP. Here's hoping he retires soon.


2 posted on 03/28/2006 1:40:18 PM PST by peyton randolph (As long is it does me no harm, I don't care if one worships Elmer Fudd.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
He's going to play both sides against the middle and in the end he will claim that censure maybe warranted but it's premature. Hell with the Judiciary and take it to the floor now like Frist should have done to start with.
4 posted on 03/28/2006 1:44:27 PM PST by Wasanother (Terrorist come in many forms but all are RATS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
"The FISA Court has an unblemished record of integrity and the ability to maintain a secret,"

I do not think this is a factually correct statement.

6 posted on 03/28/2006 1:46:30 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter (Self appointed RNC Press Secretary for Smarmy Sound Bites.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Specter is the best screw up I know. Everyone has the right to be stupid, but Specter's abusing the privilege.


7 posted on 03/28/2006 1:46:57 PM PST by b4its2late (There are good terrorists.............. DEAD ONES.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
"Specter Tuesday said the White House has "pretty much abandoned" the "preposterous argument" that the National Security Agency's warrantless-surveillance program was authorized by Congress when it passed the authorization for the use of military force in the war on terror. "

While inherent powers let the president surveil defensively, the AUMF is the source for his power to surveil offensively. That may not be germane to most, if any, of the criticism of the program. But it's true, not "preposterous".

8 posted on 03/28/2006 1:47:25 PM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

It looks like either Spechter or Feingold is flat out lying and I'd like to know who.


10 posted on 03/28/2006 1:48:17 PM PST by jazusamo (Excuse me Helen, I'm answering your first accusation. - President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
"You have been briefed," Specter said to Hatch. "You say you believe it is constitutional...but you are not a judge."

I would trust Senator Hatch to understand constitutional law as much as I would trust the average judge. Judges are just people who got appointed.

11 posted on 03/28/2006 1:56:57 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Text of Specter's proposed NSA Bill
Text of DeWine's proposed NSA bill
DeWine's NSA Bill passed from Intelligence to Judiciary Committee

Thanks for posting Byron's piece. I was wondering how today's hearing went. Leahy issued his opening comments, and that is all I'd seen 'til now.

And I agree with Specter that the AUMF argument was weak, if not an outright self-set trap by the White House. The argument had the effect of pssing off some of the people that the President wants to have on his side, Congress.

19 posted on 03/28/2006 2:18:32 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
"The FISA Court has an unblemished record of integrity and the ability to maintain a secret,"

He should read some of the hysterically funny parts of the 911 Commission Report that deal with FISA...especially where it deals with FBI agents debating on what could be done about searching a certain laptop computer.
20 posted on 03/28/2006 2:19:28 PM PST by P-40 (http://www.590klbj.com/forum/index.php?referrerid=1854)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Please, remind me why Specter was so desperate to be Judiciary Chairman.


26 posted on 03/28/2006 4:36:57 PM PST by sefarkas (Why vote Democrat Lite?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem; All

FIRST and FOREMOST: THIS IS AMNESTY PURE AND SIMPLE.

Attempting to say it is not amnest is an insult to any intligence.

This is about as absurd as clinton's attempt to say tax increases were "contributions"

The fact these people are illegal should ban them from EVER obtaining citizenship.

When you consider the CURRENT LAW HOLDS you have to hide for 10 years, the McCain bill is a RELAXING of current law!


33 posted on 03/28/2006 6:49:52 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
"The FISA Court has an unblemished record of integrity and the ability to maintain a secret," Specter said.

That is a misstatement. The FISA Judge refused to recognize the Patriot act, and then told the New York Times the President was violating the law.

The FISA Court of Review smacked them down over it. One of the FISA Judges resigned after the Court of Review said the President was right, and the FISA Judge was wrong.

He is probably one of the "sources".

35 posted on 03/28/2006 7:01:36 PM PST by Dan(9698)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson