Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Red China Attains Global Control of Ports
NewsMax ^ | Monday, March 27, 2006 | Charles R. Smith

Posted on 03/27/2006 4:07:40 AM PST by IrishMike

Overlooked during America's preoccupation with the Dubai ports deal is a much more imminent threat - China's methodical campaign to gain control of global ports that are strategically positioned to support military or economic actions against the United States - a move that has gone virtually unnoticed.

The powerful Chinese-owned Hutchison Whampoa Ltd. is now the world's biggest cargo terminal operator, according to London-based Drewry Shipping Consultants. It also is the world's largest port owner.

Hutchison Port Holdings has assumed control of scores of potential economic choke points, including 169 berths at 41 ports worldwide. These facilities control about 15 percent of global maritime container traffic.

Some of Hutchison's ports lie near key sea lines of communication, such as the Panama Canal, the Suez Canal and the eastern coast of the United States. Of the eight international regions with choke points labeled by the Department of Defense as "U.S. lifelines and transit regions," Hutchison has ports in six.

"Amidst the furor over a U.A.E. corporate takeover of major U.S. and Canadian seaports, scant notice has been given to the longstanding and continuing threat from the PRC/Triad [People's Republic of China and Chinese mobsters] 'business' presence at seaports around the world, including the U.S. and Canada," stated a top-level Canadian port security analyst.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: china; ports; waronterror; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: indcons; buglemanster; monkeywrench; Paul_Denton; driftdiver; NZerFromHK

Gogoman......
Boogeyman....
Boogeymonster....
Buglemanster......

.....trollmonster

deja vu?


41 posted on 03/28/2006 10:15:14 AM PST by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Gengis Khan

No, pganini is different from this one.


42 posted on 03/28/2006 10:26:12 AM PST by monkeywrench (Deut. 27:17 Cursed be he that removeth his neighbor's landmark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Frenetic

"Do you favor isolationism?"

As opposed to what? Should we give our enemies the weapons they will use to kill us?

Has China done anything to help the US? Have they helped in the war on terrorism? Do they have any troops in Afganistan? Are they giving us intelligence? What exactly have they done to counter the North Korean threat?

So exactly how is China a friend of the US or any western country?


43 posted on 03/28/2006 6:20:13 PM PST by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

You Wrote: "So exactly how is China a friend of the US or any western country?"

- Never said they were. I said China has always been isolationist. Isolationists aren't friends with anyone.

My view is that Christianity & Capitalism are the two greatest hopes to bring freedom and revolution to China and perhaps change their attitude towards the rest of the world. China will not be able to quash these two forces for ever. They’ve tried and are trying but the momentum against them keeps building. Sooner or later China will change from within; they can’t stop it forever or without killing millions of their own people.


44 posted on 03/29/2006 4:08:19 AM PST by Frenetic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike; abner; Abundy; AGreatPer; alisasny; ALlRightAllTheTime; AlwaysFree; AnnaSASsyFR; ...

BTTT!


45 posted on 03/29/2006 9:07:52 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Now is the time for all good customes agents in Tiajunna to come to the aid of their stuned beebers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frenetic
they can’t stop it forever or without killing millions of their own people. <>p> Which, if history is any teacher, they have been willing to do in the past, and may well resort to in the future. I believe before that happens, they will try and turn their people outward...like the Nazis of the late 1930's did.
46 posted on 03/29/2006 9:18:53 PM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

We are supposed to be nice to China and honor its ambitions to be a superpower like the US. /sarc


47 posted on 03/29/2006 9:27:44 PM PST by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fitzcarraldo

Springtime for Mao


48 posted on 03/29/2006 9:47:45 PM PST by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

You Wrote: "Which, if history is any teacher, they have been willing to do in the past, and may well resort to in the future. I believe before that happens, they will try and turn their people outward...like the Nazis of the late 1930's did."

- You've got a good point there. China has killed 10's of millions of its own people in the past however it has been all due to internal division of collapsing dynasties and communism and there is little propensity to lash outward. Not to say it couldn't happen, just if it did it would most likely be over its own borders and territory, like going to war to retake Taiwan.

This site does a decent job of summing up democide in China. http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/CHINA.CHAP1.HTM



49 posted on 03/30/2006 3:49:14 AM PST by Frenetic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

As a side note. My belief is that China is essentially hamstrung by internal rebellion, international politics, the information age and global economics. Anything lashing out it does will most likely be rhetoric as the current regime fails from within. Logic would suggest that it be better to keep strife internal then start a world war it cannot survive or win. Besides, either option would negate any progress China has made the last 50 years. My belief is that China is experiencing birth pains as a new China is slowing forming to replace the old order.

In any case it’s kind of a “hope for the best, prepare for the worst” mentality. Keep an eye on China and don’t overtly provoke them, counter any global geo-mili-political moves it makes and foster internal change and quiet revolution all while keeping sure not to alienate the Chinese people. The best case scenario and goal for the US and the world would be to walk with the Chinese as political enemies through revolution and emerge as friends on the way out. It might seem like a pipe dream but it’s the only alternative to a disastrous war.


50 posted on 03/30/2006 4:23:12 AM PST by Frenetic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Frenetic
The Chinese have had and do have external ambitions. Korea, Tibet, Taiwan, the Spratley Islands, Vietnam, etc. It's a fairly recent list...menaing not associated with the former dynasties in any way.

They are still communists and totalitarian and what's worse, they have found an economic model (basically fascist in nature) to overcome the failed Stalinist and Maoist economic po0licies that had failed so miserably.

If they can get their people to focus on nationalism and outward (and they are trying to do this), then we will face a threat IMHO, an order of magnitude greater than Nazi Germany in its day. They are currently conducting a massive modernization and buildup of their military ion this regard. See:

The Rising Sea Dragon in Asia

In my estimation we need to treat the Red Chinese government the same way that Reagan did the Soviets in his day. There is still time to do that and bring about their economic downfall which would lead to the things you have mentioned. It may be too late to avoid some conflict and certainly economic strain of cutting China off...but that will be light compared to what may well be in store if we do not.

In order to air my concerns, I have written an entire series of novels that presents a fictional scenario of where things might lead if we do not curb their growth.

The Dragons Fury Series.

51 posted on 03/30/2006 5:01:51 AM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

just goes to show how shallow, dumb and hypocritical our politicians on both sides are.


52 posted on 03/30/2006 6:09:12 AM PST by Coleus (What were Ted Kennedy & his nephew doing on Good Friday, 1991? Getting drunk and raping women)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Did you read the whole article. I did. It's like they're obsessed with going after us, as opposed to giving their people more freedom and prosperity and further freeing up and privatizing their semi-statist economy. As far as I'm concerned, the Red Chinese leadership can rot in Hell.


53 posted on 03/30/2006 3:20:12 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Now is the time for all good customes agents in Tiajunna to come to the aid of their stuned beebers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

Yeah. They're just another trading partner. Nothing to see here. /s


54 posted on 03/30/2006 3:20:52 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Now is the time for all good customes agents in Tiajunna to come to the aid of their stuned beebers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson