I see that since you can't rebut her statement on the facts (since it is accurate), you're dishonestly attempting a lame ad hominem by falsely claiming that she was hysterical, when she was not.
When I read her statement as written, it sounds like she is making "creationism" some kind of hidden bogeyman behind intelligent design.
No big deal to me what kind of semantic games anyone wants to play on this issue - the fact is that the material world and living organisms exist now and you or this lady or Carl Sagan or Darryl "Chocolate Thunder" Dawkins...etc...don't "really" know how it came to be. So please stop acting like you got it all figured out - YOU DON'T.
And, I hardly think intelligent design is out preying on states, whatever the heck that means.