Posted on 03/26/2006 6:36:26 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster
China says no to Japan's proposal on UN dues
www.chinaview.cn 2006-03-24 00:11:05
BEIJING, March 23 (Xinhua) -- A Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman said here Thursday China "firmly" opposes Japan's proposal to revise UN dues assessments and set a minimum rate for permanent members of the Security Council.
Japan presented a proposal to the UN General Assembly budget committee on March 10, saying each of the five permanent council members -- the United States, Russia, Britain, China and France --should contribute at least 3 percent or 5 percent of the UN budget.
Under the proposal, China and Russia, whose dues currently account for 2.1 percent and 1.1 percent of the total, would pay much more each year.
Spokesman Qin Gang said Japan's proposal attempts to replace the established principle of capacity to pay with the concept of responsibility to pay.
"The Chinese government firmly opposes it," Qin said.
Qin said the crux of Japan's proposal is to connect power with UN dues and thus enabling countries to buy power.
"This will undermine the basic principle of sovereign equality in the UN Charter and severely infringe the interests of the developing countries," Qin said.
Qin said the principle of capacity to pay was the basic principle in allotting UN fees and has proved to be effective. "It also reflects the consensus of all countries and should not be changed."
Qin said China still has a very low per capita income despite its rapid economic development. "Even so, the percentage of China's UN dues ranked ninth among the UN members and China has always faithfully fulfilled its financial obligation to the United Nations."
He said China has always paid its UN fees on time and it also shoulders its share of the cost of UN peace keeping as well as dues subtracted from other countries.
"As China's economy grows, China is willing to make a greater contribution," he said.
Qin said UN dues assessment has a direct bearing on UN's capacity to fulfill its responsibility.
"We hope a fair and rational scheme, which is consistent with the UN Charter, will be reached based on broad consultation," he said.
The scale of UN dues assessments is reviewed every three years and the General Assembly budget committee, where all 191 UN member states are represented, is due to determine the scale for the 2007-2009 period by the end of December.
Ping!
Perhaps we need to have a second look on the charter itself...
I actually find myself agreeing with the ChiComs on this one. The UN can go F themselves.
What % do we pay?
If the UN was disbanned it would be a very bad thing. After all, how would a wannabe dictator from a third world country ever get enough kickbacks and bribes to line their Swiss bank accounts? Those poor guys can't streal riches from people that have nothing. They need to steal it from the rich countries of the world.
They pay just enough to keep their spies feet in the door.
"What % do we pay?"
About 26%
I agree. Everyone should quit paying UN dues and let the place crumble. How about France and Germany pay the whole shot, since they are the ones who want it to be their government. They can have all those idiots in the UN to themselves.
The rest of the world will rent a new building with a table and chairs to sit down and discuss mutual interests, like the UN was supposed to be for.
"The Chinese government firmly opposes it," Qin said.
Russia also said "Nyet!" (no)
I propose that the UN, if it is not to be scrapped altogether, be run like a corporation. One vote for each dollar you give to its budget.
We'd soon see some action.
Other post-WWII arrangements have outlived their usefulness. SEATO comes to mind. Time to let this one go, too.
Wow! They should pay a lot more than just three percent. That's a really unfair %.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.