Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Southack; PatrickHenry
I would have expected Special Relativity to deal with the kinematic effect, but that General Relativity would have dealt with the Gravitational effect.

SR can only deal with the kinematics of constant velocities. When accelerations or gravitational fields are involved, GR is needed; and in its framework, an accelerating reference frame and gravitational field are equivalent, just as PH stated.

55 posted on 03/25/2006 3:11:31 PM PST by Quark2005 (Confidence follows from consilience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: Quark2005; PatrickHenry
"When accelerations or gravitational fields are involved, GR is needed; and in its framework, an accelerating reference frame and gravitational field are equivalent, just as PH stated."

Was GR or SR cited in that post by PatrickHenry?

58 posted on 03/25/2006 3:19:41 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: Quark2005
When accelerations or gravitational fields are involved, GR is needed; and in its framework, an accelerating reference frame and gravitational field are equivalent, just as PH stated.

The reason I mentioned the special theory is that I believe time dilation can be determined with nothing more complicated than the Lorentz transformation. So I didn't think the General Theory was involved. I'm well aware, however, that the GT deals with gravity.

As always, I welcome corrections (I need them).

62 posted on 03/25/2006 4:09:48 PM PST by PatrickHenry (Yo momma's so fat she's got a Schwarzschild radius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson