"The application of the scientific methodology using survival of the fittest has been in place in our public education since government deemed it credible.
The results are plain to see government must care for the least fit. "
Your logic is, how shall we say, less than convincing. If survival of the fittest is what is being taught as the correct ethical system, that would mean that least fit would NOT being getting cared for. Do you even read what you write?
I thought what he meant was that since so many in the government have ACCEPTED social Darwinism, that said bureaucrats feel it is their noble duty to use the full force of liberal government to shield the weak from what would otherwise be their sad fate.
The whole liberal version of noblesse oblige, in fact.
Sorry I haven't been on the threads making inane non sequiturs lately, I've been on other website breathlessly and apprehensively following H5N1.
Talk about your survival of the fittest--in humans, at least, H5N1 appears to be a counterexample, like the 1918 flu epidemic. Freepmail me for details. :-(