Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jacquerie

So... you don't know this particular case, but you know the judge was wrong and usurped powers that were not his. Amazing!


13 posted on 03/24/2006 5:09:53 AM PST by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: linda_22003

In fairness, the judge had no choice but to rule the way he did because of bad earlier Supreme Court precedent. Similar to Judge Alito once striking down a Pennsylvania pro-life statute.

However, at the time may of us noted that Jones could have simply issued a routine ruling citing precedent and left it at that. The fact that he issued such a rhetorically harsh, grandstanding type ruling made it apparent that he was playing to the media and the leftist law journal crowd. In other words, the Greenhouse Effect was Souterizing him.

His whining and his joining in with O'Connor & Ginzburg on their silly crusade to shut down any disagreement with liberal rulings only confirms that this is the case.


29 posted on 03/24/2006 7:06:26 AM PST by puroresu (Conservatism is an observation; Liberalism is an ideology)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: linda_22003

Bottom quartile in reading comprehension, right?


81 posted on 03/24/2006 8:50:22 AM PST by Jacquerie (Democrats soil institutions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson