Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

This is just a drill: Thanks to John McCain, Free Republic will shut down tomorrow at high noon for
Free Republic ^

Posted on 03/23/2006 8:03:45 PM PST by Jim Robinson

Edited on 03/24/2006 11:31:56 AM PST by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,181-1,2001,201-1,2201,221-1,2401,241-1,257 last
To: Content Provider

Just sent to McCain HQ, through my Fundraising website for him.
Will update.
Ops4

I am an avid Republican backer who has letters on my wall for President Bush for my help in his last two campaigns for President.

I have worked hard both in Florida, for our candidates.

One of the main sites I have had help us are the Florida Freerepulc.com site, and the
Town Hall site.

It has come to my attention that a move that could devastate all of our hard work is in the works and could cost us the entire consvervative vote in this election.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1602124/posts?page=51,50

Read the thread and advise me on this issue, ASAP.
EMM Florida


1,241 posted on 03/25/2008 10:08:03 AM PDT by OPS4 (Ops4 God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1238 | View Replies]

To: OPS4

Court spurns appeal over ‘Hillary’ film

March 25, 2008

By Jennifer Harper - The Supreme Court yesterday rejected without comment an appeal from a District-based advocacy group that promotional ads for its 90-minute political documentary critical of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton are protected by First Amendment rights and, therefore, exempt from campaign-finance laws.

As a result, Citizens United must include a disclaimer and disclose its donors in commercials for “Hillary: The Movie.” The film includes interviews with many high-profile conservatives, including political commentator Ann Coulter, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and former House Majority Leader Dick Armey.

The cast is billed as “experts, opinion makers, and many of the people who personally locked horns with the Clintons.”

“We are back at square one, essentially,” said Jim Bopp, an Indiana-based lawyer who represented Citizens United in their case. “We plan to continue in the District Court to resolve the case based on its merits.”

In recent years, the group has produced films examining the United Nations, illegal immigration, faith in America and Michael Moore’s 2004 film “Fahrenheit 911,” which was critical of the Bush administration’s actions after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

Citizens United became interested last year in the finer points of movie promotion after the Supreme Court ruled that Wisconsin Right to Life could not be prohibited from broadcasting “genuine issue ads” at certain critical times — specifically, blackout periods before elections, as required by the McCain-Feingold campaign-finance law.

The Federal Election Commission (FEC), however, still requires such groups to include a list of donors and a disclaimer with the ad itself.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080325/NATION/808377825/1002


1,242 posted on 03/25/2008 11:49:23 AM PDT by OPS4 (Ops4 God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1241 | View Replies]

To: OPS4

“I would rather have a clean government than one where quote First Amendment rights are being respected, that has become corrupt. If I had my choice, I’d rather have the clean government.”

“I am sure that Senator Clinton would make a good President. I have no doubt that Senator Clinton would make a good President.”

Two John McCain quotes that are very interesting juxtaposed against each other.


1,243 posted on 03/25/2008 12:10:05 PM PDT by Content Provider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1242 | View Replies]

To: Content Provider

Wow, you are really doing some digging. Good find. I never saw this thread the first time around. I’m sure Yahoo, Google, AOL and MSN will pitch in and help censor political speech here the way they willingly assist the CCP in China.


1,244 posted on 03/25/2008 2:33:11 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1233 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/mccain/

It’s a treasure trove. You can go way back by editing the end number, like so:

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/mccain/14000


1,245 posted on 03/25/2008 2:56:03 PM PDT by Content Provider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1244 | View Replies]

To: Content Provider

Thanks. I have wondered how to go back without going page by page in a comments or keyword search. Duh! It’s really kind of obvious isn’t it? (that’s a rhetorical question) lol


1,246 posted on 03/25/2008 6:06:07 PM PDT by TigersEye (A fine is a tax for doing wrong. A tax is a fine for doing well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1245 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye; calcowgirl

Wasn’t even obvious to me, and I’m a programmer. But I caught the pattern of the numbers after scrolling through the categories a bit, and figured it out.

calcowgirl, ICMP type 3 packet for you, amusement more than data


1,247 posted on 03/25/2008 6:35:17 PM PDT by Content Provider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1246 | View Replies]

To: Content Provider

I don’t feel so bad then because I’m just a point-and-clicker. I have figured out in the past though that I could get into FTP files and other areas of websites I wasn’t supposed to by cutting parts of URLs or trying a higher or lower number on the end than the one I had found some other way.


1,248 posted on 03/25/2008 6:42:12 PM PDT by TigersEye (A fine is a tax for doing wrong. A tax is a fine for doing well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1247 | View Replies]

To: Content Provider; TigersEye

I do that to jump back in time. Every 1,000,000 digits in the URL is roughly a year.
I think 1,500,000 takes you back to 2003, and so on.

What is “ICMP type 3 packet”?


1,249 posted on 03/25/2008 6:59:07 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1247 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

ICMP type 3 is a standard ping... sorry, I’m a bit of a nerd.


1,250 posted on 03/25/2008 7:09:59 PM PDT by Content Provider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1249 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Does this mean we have to become a "527?"

Or does this mean it's tea time at Boston harbor?

I hope I don't get too old before the excrement hits the oscillator.

5.56mm

1,251 posted on 03/25/2008 7:19:09 PM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

What am I going to do with all this popcorn?


1,252 posted on 03/25/2008 7:26:57 PM PDT by sweetiepiezer (A typical white person..............................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M203M4

This post goes BUMP (in the night)!


1,253 posted on 05/15/2008 9:34:25 PM PDT by M203M4 (True Universal Suffrage: Pets of dead illegal-immigrant felons voting Democrat (twice))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1252 | View Replies]

To: rwilson99
Wouldn't the proper thing to do be to wait until the FEC were to issue a specific fine or ruling against FR in order to challenge the law in court.

How about simply use a filter to replace all mention of "McCain" or "Obama" with "McCensor" and "OtherGuy"? I think you can still talk politics if you don't mention the candidates in question.

1,254 posted on 06/07/2008 1:39:37 PM PDT by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Does that mean I can’t urge people not to vote for that RINO, too? In his case, I wish this were true. He is a disaster in the making.


1,255 posted on 06/07/2008 1:42:07 PM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Don’t scare us like that.


1,256 posted on 06/07/2008 1:46:24 PM PDT by gitmo (From now on, ending a sentence with a preposition is something up with which I will not put.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
It was a REPUBLICAN President who not only refused to veto the unconstitutional travesty, but who signed it into law on March 27th, 2002.

An unconstitutional statute is not law; unconstitutional statutes, other than those which become unconstitutional as a result of a Constitutional Amendment which is ratified after their signing, are void from the moment of inception.

That isn't to say that agents of an illegitimate government won't prosecute people for violating illegitimate statutes, but rather to note that such a government does not deserve deserve any trappings of legitimacy, including the use of phrases like "into law".

1,257 posted on 06/07/2008 1:54:15 PM PDT by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1015 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,181-1,2001,201-1,2201,221-1,2401,241-1,257 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson