To: Fitzcarraldo
Don't overreact. See post 85. The scanning equipment runs itself and the operators can't disable it either.
87 posted on
03/24/2006 12:05:05 AM PST by
carl in alaska
(The raven watching news of the Florida recounts stirred and spoke. Quoth the raven..."NeverGore.")
To: carl in alaska
Coast to Coast (Nuts to Nuts) is going crazy over this story.
Noory is going ballistic and says this will destroy Bush and cause his impeachment.
Buy tinfoil stocks..NOW.
88 posted on
03/24/2006 12:23:38 AM PST by
AlexW
(Reporting from Bratislava, Slovakia)
To: carl in alaska
Don't overreact. See post 85. The scanning equipment runs itself and the operators can't disable it either.
I am PRO-DPW. But here is the key problem with this port deal:
"The fact that foreign workers would have access to how the United States screens various containers for nuclear material and how this technology scrutinizes the containers all those things allow someone with a nefarious intention to thwart the screening."
It is not a matter of manipulating the equipment. It is a matter of manipulating what passes through it to find out what kind of shielding will defeat it. That information can then be sold or used to defeat the same equipment at any port. My 81-year-old MOM understood the possibilities in a minute when I explained it and she has no nuclear knowledge (I do.)
94 posted on
03/24/2006 3:34:19 AM PST by
UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
(Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - IT'S ISLAM, STUPID! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson