Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fitzcarraldo

Don't overreact. See post 85. The scanning equipment runs itself and the operators can't disable it either.


87 posted on 03/24/2006 12:05:05 AM PST by carl in alaska (The raven watching news of the Florida recounts stirred and spoke. Quoth the raven..."NeverGore.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: carl in alaska
Coast to Coast (Nuts to Nuts) is going crazy over this story.
Noory is going ballistic and says this will destroy Bush and cause his impeachment.
Buy tinfoil stocks..NOW.
88 posted on 03/24/2006 12:23:38 AM PST by AlexW (Reporting from Bratislava, Slovakia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

To: carl in alaska
Don't overreact. See post 85. The scanning equipment runs itself and the operators can't disable it either.

I am PRO-DPW. But here is the key problem with this port deal:

"The fact that foreign workers would have access to how the United States screens various containers for nuclear material and how this technology scrutinizes the containers — all those things allow someone with a nefarious intention to thwart the screening."

It is not a matter of manipulating the equipment. It is a matter of manipulating what passes through it to find out what kind of shielding will defeat it. That information can then be sold or used to defeat the same equipment at any port. My 81-year-old MOM understood the possibilities in a minute when I explained it and she has no nuclear knowledge (I do.)
94 posted on 03/24/2006 3:34:19 AM PST by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - IT'S ISLAM, STUPID! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson