Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Reagan Man
Well, boo hoo hoo. I have posted here since 1998, well before George Bush was considered a candidate. I am on record of my positions, and anyone who reads this is free to look at my posts.

I am on record as being pro-life, pro-military, pro-US, and pro-small government.

However, I also have common sense and political skills, so I don't trash people who are not 100% in agreement with me. I want Republicans who lean conservative to be elected, and I am practical about the compromises needed to get a majority so that the liberals (the real enemy) can be defeated.

You are only interested in trashing Bush as not the 100% conservative you desire. Well, good luck to you.

However, you are throwing the baby out with the bathwater if you don't realize the opportunity we have been given by these stories which reveal the media as ultra-liberal and right now, anti-Bush. You aren't interested in this story because you are already anti-Bush. That's fine, except that you are missing the opportunity this story gives to all conservatives, whether pro- or anti-Bush. What we want is for the American people to look to other sources rather than the MSM. This would be an advantage to anyone you support in 2008. Conservatives are not going to get fair treatment by the current MSM. One would think you would like to take this incident to help chip away at their influence, so that the conservative message can get out. Apparently, you don't think this is a priority.

369 posted on 03/23/2006 5:37:09 PM PST by Miss Marple (Lord, please look after Mozart Lover's and Jemian's sons and keep them strong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies ]


To: Miss Marple
The "mixed messages" reference was a major feature of Bush's debate. This is one line the President used:

He doesn't want U.S. leadership, however, to send mixed signals, to not stand with the Iraqi people.

372 posted on 03/23/2006 5:57:35 PM PST by WVNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 369 | View Replies ]

To: Miss Marple
>>>>I am on record as being pro-life, pro-military, pro-US, and pro-small government.

Right. Hopefully this will be the FIRST of many posts in which you direct your political rhetoric towards issues that advance the conservative agenda, instead of just the Bush agenda.

>>>>You are only interested in trashing Bush as not the 100% conservative you desire. Well, good

That is an asinine statement and you know it. There are major differences between trashing Bush and criticizing Bush`s domestic governing record. As I said, you can't accept honest criticism of the President because you're a dyed-in-the-wool Bush supporter. You take ANY criticism of Bush as a personal affront on yourself. So be it.

>>>>You aren't interested in this story because you are already anti-Bush.

If that was the case, then I wouldn't be supporting the President's WOT. Now would I? Of course not. So, stop whining and grow some thicker skin.

375 posted on 03/23/2006 6:07:28 PM PST by Reagan Man (Secure our borders;punish employers who hire illegals;stop all welfare to illegals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 369 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson