I am a conservative. I'm a big supporter of free speech and political dissent. When Bush does a good job, I support him. When Bush makes a bad decision I criticize him. OTOH. I don't see you as someone who advocates the conservative agenda. I have never seen you post one article thread that advances the major tenets of conservatism. Frankly, I haven't seen a reply from you in recent years that advances the conservative agenda whatsoever. Its all Bush, all the time with you.
calling FR posters yahoos is pretty caviler of you. :)
I am on record as being pro-life, pro-military, pro-US, and pro-small government.
However, I also have common sense and political skills, so I don't trash people who are not 100% in agreement with me. I want Republicans who lean conservative to be elected, and I am practical about the compromises needed to get a majority so that the liberals (the real enemy) can be defeated.
You are only interested in trashing Bush as not the 100% conservative you desire. Well, good luck to you.
However, you are throwing the baby out with the bathwater if you don't realize the opportunity we have been given by these stories which reveal the media as ultra-liberal and right now, anti-Bush. You aren't interested in this story because you are already anti-Bush. That's fine, except that you are missing the opportunity this story gives to all conservatives, whether pro- or anti-Bush. What we want is for the American people to look to other sources rather than the MSM. This would be an advantage to anyone you support in 2008. Conservatives are not going to get fair treatment by the current MSM. One would think you would like to take this incident to help chip away at their influence, so that the conservative message can get out. Apparently, you don't think this is a priority.