Skip to comments.
Polygamy upsets gay activists
Kansas City Star ^
| Mar. 19, 2006
| CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER
Posted on 03/22/2006 8:01:47 PM PST by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201 next last
1
posted on
03/22/2006 8:01:49 PM PST
by
neverdem
To: neverdem
What's worse: Being gay or having 8 wives? End of story.
2
posted on
03/22/2006 8:03:16 PM PST
by
jdm
To: neverdem
It's less offensive than gay marriage.
3
posted on
03/22/2006 8:03:21 PM PST
by
Vicomte13
(Et alors?)
To: neverdem
not far behind is bestiality
4
posted on
03/22/2006 8:03:26 PM PST
by
ElkGroveDan
(California bashers will be called out)
To: neverdem
With every wife comes another ste of inlaws. No thanks.
5
posted on
03/22/2006 8:04:02 PM PST
by
bad company
("Any damned fool can write a plan. It's the execution that gets you all screwed up." - James F. Hol.)
To: ElkGroveDan
Nope, child marriage comes next. It's gay marriage -> polygamy -> child marriage (NAMBLA starts acting up again at this point) -> bestiality.
6
posted on
03/22/2006 8:04:58 PM PST
by
Gordongekko909
(I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
To: jdm
Gay or eight wives, gay or eight wives... being single isn't an option, is it? How about suicide?
7
posted on
03/22/2006 8:05:29 PM PST
by
Gordongekko909
(I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
To: neverdem
Sodomites are fooling themselves if they think they can argue FOR the rights of the bisexual and against their right to marry someone of EACH sex. Why that would be asking him or her to deny half her/his existence... to choose a sexual preference.
8
posted on
03/22/2006 8:05:52 PM PST
by
weegee
("Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but Democrats believe every day is April 15.")
To: neverdem
Hollywierd has moved on to 'normalizing' the next perversion.
Doesn't that mean that the gays have won?
9
posted on
03/22/2006 8:06:03 PM PST
by
BenLurkin
(O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
To: neverdem
homosexuality is an intrinsic state that “occupies a deeper level of human consciousness.” My, isn't that special?
10
posted on
03/22/2006 8:06:17 PM PST
by
Graybeard58
(Remember and pray for Sgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
To: bad company
Hey, you're looking at the practical side. :-)
11
posted on
03/22/2006 8:07:01 PM PST
by
jazusamo
(Excuse me Helen, I'm answering your first accusation. - President Bush)
To: bad company
Must take an incredibly weak woman to accept such a living arrangement.
Then again, it's the same irony that explains why felons and drug dealers get more ladies than responsible guys...
To: BenLurkin
No. It means that the left is opening up a new front. They haven't won the first one.
13
posted on
03/22/2006 8:08:08 PM PST
by
Gordongekko909
(I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
To: jdm
Both sound painful to me!!!!
14
posted on
03/22/2006 8:08:21 PM PST
by
Fielding
(Sans Dieu Rien)
To: bad company
Yeah! And if each wife comes from a polygamist family, you could get a
dozen new in-laws with each one!
YIKES!!
15
posted on
03/22/2006 8:08:36 PM PST
by
uglybiker
(Don't blame me. I didn't make you stupid.)
To: bad company
16
posted on
03/22/2006 8:09:26 PM PST
by
Do not dub me shapka broham
("The moment that someone wants to forbid caricatures, that is the moment we publish them.")
To: neverdem
YOu want to watch a Gay person go into spasms, ask them why a father can't marry his daughter if he gets a vasectomy. The "union" meets all the gay criteria:
It can't produce children
It is all about Love
It is 2 people.
They sputter but can't answer.
17
posted on
03/22/2006 8:10:16 PM PST
by
freedumb2003
(Diplomacy is what you do after you kick the enemy's ass and define their lives afterward)
To: SteveMcKing
That happens because responsible guys don't chase women like felons and drug dealers do. Responsible guys also don't pass women around, or marry women who get passed around.
Take a look at some of the women these felons and drug dealers do their thing with. That should explain a few things.
18
posted on
03/22/2006 8:10:20 PM PST
by
Gordongekko909
(I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
To: freedumb2003
Oh yeah, forgot about incest. That comes after child marriage.
Gay marriage -> polygamy -> child marriage -> incest -> bestiality
19
posted on
03/22/2006 8:11:26 PM PST
by
Gordongekko909
(I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
To: neverdem
I bet that buggary with animals does not offend the LGBT community.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson