Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dr_lew
Some physicist (wish I could remember who) said that a better name for our particle accelerators would be particle preponderators, because most of the energy they impart to the particles doesn't do much acceleratin', because the particles get very close to C very soon; after that, it's almost all preponderatin'.
101 posted on 03/22/2006 9:06:06 PM PST by Erasmus (Eat beef. Someone has to control the cow population!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]


To: Erasmus
...because the particles get very close to C very soon; after that, it's almost all preponderatin'.

In my graduate education, the idea of mass dilation was deprecated. It is after all predicated on the imperative to preserve F = ma. It was pointed out that mass became a directional quantity, since the particle's resistance to perpendicular acceleration was not increased at all, so it was better to identify the concept of mass with the "rest mass", and simply adopt the relativistic momentum, presevering the Newtonian F = dP/dt.

I arrived at the idea that "hitting power" was the measure of speed to be adopted, instead of travel time, much as in ballistics. A bullet going at 0.99c is going to dump 7.1 times its rest energy into a target, compared with 2.3 for a .9c bullet, so it has about 3 times the kinetic energy even if it's only going 10% faster by elapsed time.

It's interesting. I've seen both tennis and hockey commentators speak of "heavy" shots, as though there were some mystical ability to impart momentum to a ball or puck, independently of making it go faster. Pffffffthathinatin'

110 posted on 03/22/2006 9:41:18 PM PST by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson