Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas arresting people in bars for being drunk
Yahoo News ^

Posted on 03/22/2006 4:32:35 PM PST by stacytec

SAN ANTONIO, Texas (Reuters) - Texas has begun sending undercover agents into bars to arrest drinkers for being drunk, a spokeswoman for the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission said on Wednesday.

The first sting operation was conducted recently in a Dallas suburb where agents infiltrated 36 bars and arrested 30 people for public intoxication, said the commission's Carolyn Beck.

Being in a bar does not exempt one from the state laws against public drunkenness, Beck said.

The goal, she said, was to detain drunks before they leave a bar and go do something dangerous like drive a car.

"We feel that the only way we're going to get at the drunk driving problem and the problem of people hurting each other while drunk is by crackdowns like this," she said.

"There are a lot of dangerous and stupid things people do when they're intoxicated, other than get behind the wheel of a car," Beck said. "People walk out into traffic and get run over, people jump off of balconies trying to reach a swimming pool and miss."

She said the sting operations would continue throughout the state.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: donutwatch; libertarians; nannystate; prohibition
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: Pilsner

"Did you really think we want those laws observed?" said Dr. Ferris. "We want them to be broken. You'd better get it straight that it's not a bunch of boy scouts you're up against... We're after power and we mean it... There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What's there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced or objectively interpreted – and you create a nation of law-breakers – and then you cash in on guilt. Now that's the system, Mr. Reardon, that's the game, and once you understand it, you'll be much easier to deal with." ('Atlas Shrugged' 1957)


61 posted on 03/23/2006 5:14:41 AM PST by CSM (Lick a finger, politicize the wind, and place the finger into the wind. - EGPWS, 1/26/2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Trajan88
Just a matter of time until one's arrested for drankin' in one's home.

That's happening already. It is against the law in Texas to consume alcohol before noon on Sunday, even at home.

62 posted on 03/23/2006 5:34:27 AM PST by houeto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: houeto
That's happening already. It is against the law in Texas to consume alcohol before noon on Sunday, even at home. That’s crazy talk. Sunday is the sacred football day, pre-game shows and alcohol consumption are prerequisites. Crossing Texas off the list of places I would live.
63 posted on 03/23/2006 8:10:01 AM PST by stacytec (Nihilism, its whats for dinner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: stacytec
That’s crazy talk.

Had two close friends of mine arrested one Sunday morning sitting at a picnic table in the front yard. They were BBQing, drinking beers and waiting for the Houston Oilers' game to start.

Cop drove by, saw them drinking beer and the empties on the table. He stopped, arrested them for consumption before noon and took them to jail.

He told them that they should have been in the house or the backyard but not out front flaunting the law. They didn't know that was the law.

I didn't either till I came over later to find that one buddie's wife was downtown bailing them out.

Pasadena, Texas a few years ago.

64 posted on 03/23/2006 9:28:32 AM PST by houeto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_no_exceptions

The USSR was a totalitarian police state, but at least it allowed its subjects to indulge their personal vices without state interference. In some respects, specifically in the area of alcohol and tobacco, modern day America is more intrusive than the Soviets were.


65 posted on 03/23/2006 9:33:26 AM PST by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: 185JHP
I liked it then and I like it now...

I bet you're a lot of fun at a party.

66 posted on 03/23/2006 9:34:31 AM PST by humblegunner (If you're gonna die, die with your boots on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Khurkris

You may be right about their legal mandate to roust customers and their methods of doing it, but I don't think so. They can and have always arrested underage drinkers in bars.

The TABC has a lot of authority inside bars because they are charged with regulating the beer and liguor industry from manufacturing right down to retail sales. For example, they can go into a bar and demand the records of sales and check them against purchases of beer and liguor to find out if the owner/bar personnel are watering drinks or bringing in supplies without a tax stamp and refilling the bottles.

They've also ruled on things like 2 for 1 drinks at happy hours.


67 posted on 03/23/2006 9:38:27 AM PST by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: stacytec
Will Texas also look into arresting stupid people and Democrats?
68 posted on 03/23/2006 9:41:27 AM PST by Liberator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Khurkris
Local offices are just that - staffed and operated by local personnel. Field or 'Enforcement Personnel' are not hired, placed or assigned by state TABC officials. The local office manager may or may not fall in this category.

I can't tell if you are just very misinformed, or are trying to keep posts going back and forth, but...

Texas Code of Criminal Procedure: Art. 2.12., WHO ARE PEACE OFFICERS. The following are peace officers:...

(6) law enforcement agents of the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission;

So Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission agents out making arrests are Peace Officers under Texas law, and are authorized to carry firearms, not just flash lights. But are they, as you say, part of some local outfit and not State employees? From the TABC website:

Vacancy announcements provide the position title, salary information, the location where the vacancy exists, closing date, job description and minimum qualification requirements. After the job closes, all applications are forwarded to the TABC Austin Headquarters. The Human Resources Division is responsible for screening each application to determine which applicants meet the minimum qualification requirements. Only applications that meet all minimum qualifications and include all proper documentation will be processed. (Emphasis added)

...

The State of Texas Application for Employment (Form AP-8), Applicant EEO Data (Form AP-8c), and the TABC Supplemental (Form HR-20) can be downloaded from this site by clicking on the following links...

Here is the link http://www.tabc.state.tx.us/jobs/default.htm

So TABC agents are State, not local.

69 posted on 03/23/2006 10:44:58 AM PST by Pilsner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Wallace T.
The only personal "vice" (opinions may differ) I can think of that the USSR officially penalized (3 yrs prison, I believe) was homosexuality, although I have a feeling this wasn't widely enforced. As for alcohol, they weren't as intrusive as modern-day US, but there have been periodic campaigns against it. Here's a URL (haven't learned to post links on FR) to some hilarious anti-alcohol posters.

http://www.tululuka.net/alco/

Of course, the USSR never claimed to be the free society that the US is supposed to be - and in many ways still is. What gets me is that some Americans have no problem reconciling freedom with the multitude of little intrusions into our personal lives (which can add up). To them, a cop on every Soviet, German, Cuban, or Chinese corner is statism, while a speed trap every half-mile (or "alcohol arrest" every half-block) in the US is A-OK. My goal is to set the bar higher.

70 posted on 03/23/2006 11:46:28 AM PST by Freedom_no_exceptions (No actual, intended, or imminent victim = no crime. No exceptions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_no_exceptions; inneroutlaw
Cheers to you and your brave family.

Meet inneroutlaw. Inneroutlaw, meet Freedom_no_exceptions.

You two should get along just fine.

71 posted on 03/23/2006 5:57:13 PM PST by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Pilsner
" I can't tell if you are just very misinformed, or are trying to keep posts going back and forth, but..."

You'll have to trust me on this, but I'm neither. I will respond at a later time. Very busy right now. Thanks for your informative replies.

72 posted on 03/23/2006 9:10:23 PM PST by Khurkris (Don't blame me. I was out the entire day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000; Squawk 8888

I just saw this on MSNBC right now this minute - they arrested people in a Texas hotel bar who were 'drunk' but the couple were staying in the hotel - they also arrested another 'drunk' even though his date was the designated driver and they arrested a young woman hotal bartender for serving 'drunks'.


73 posted on 03/24/2006 5:50:42 PM PST by Proctor (I risk my life to bring you http://www.historyofjihad.org & http://www.islamcomicbook.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Pilsner; Khurkris

I just saw this on MSNBC right now this minute - they arrested people in a Texas hotel bar who were 'drunk' but the couple were staying in the hotel - they also arrested another 'drunk' even though his date was the designated driver and they arrested a young woman hotal bartender for serving 'drunks'.


74 posted on 03/24/2006 5:51:18 PM PST by Proctor (I risk my life to bring you http://www.historyofjihad.org & http://www.islamcomicbook.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Proctor
I just saw this on MSNBC right now this minute - they arrested people in a Texas hotel bar who were 'drunk' but the couple were staying in the hotel - they also arrested another 'drunk' even though his date was the designated driver and they arrested a young woman hotal bartender for serving 'drunks'.

I should have added the bartender looked like a sweet girl earning a living and she was crying hard as she was arrested - you could tell this was her first arrest.

75 posted on 03/24/2006 5:52:23 PM PST by Proctor (I risk my life to bring you http://www.historyofjihad.org & http://www.islamcomicbook.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: stacytec
But Ossiffer, I'm not as thunk as you drink I am!

If you're happy and you know it clank your chains (clank, clank)

76 posted on 03/24/2006 5:56:03 PM PST by gorush (Exterminate the Moops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlJoePa

South Florida where making a right hand turn from the far left lane is not only legal but expected.

Turn signals do not come equiped on cars - or are faulty, seeing that they are turned on for miles at a time.

Swerving, driving on sidewalks, going 20mph in a 70-mph zone or 150mph in a 20mph zone, all legal.

I learned to drive in Wash. DC.....Nothing beats S. Florida drivers.


77 posted on 03/24/2006 6:01:10 PM PST by Brytani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: houeto

Must be quite a few years ago. A lot of bars open at 10:00AM on Sundays. Legal as long as the patrons have prepared food in front of them. Food must be cooked, chips and dip don't count, as one bar here in Angelo found out.

This exception was put in several years ago at the behest of the convention and hotel crowd, they claimed the concession was necessary to allow for the Sunday "Champagne Brunch" that had become fashionable in states that allowed it.

TABC is indeed the inbred capitol of nepotism in state gov't. That is not anectdotal, the agency literally has the highest rate of nepotistic employees in Texas.

Three years back I was arrested in a bar for "Intoxicated employee on premise". No, I wasn't crocked on duty, I was in the place watching a Cowboys game on my night off. I realized I had more than was safe, asked the girl who was working to call me a cab. As soon as I said that out loud, the couple who we later discovered were undercover boogied out the door leaving two nearly full beers. They were in a hurry to get Officer Numnuts in the place in time to bust me before the cab came.

Went to trial, had a stack of precedent cases out of Southwest 2nd relating to definition of public intoxication. Unfortunately, I got a brain-dead County Court at Law judge who somehow found that citations from the Texas Courts of Criminal Appeals were civil law and therefor irrelevant! Didn't have near the money to appeal, had to represent myself, that adventure in nonsense cost me $550. It developed in testimony they were there to respond to an "anonymous tip" that the bartender on duty was working intoxicated. When that came up a dry hole, they needed something to justify all that expense, and I was the best bet they had on a slow Thursday.


78 posted on 03/24/2006 6:23:38 PM PST by barkeep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Proctor
I didn't say this was a good idea, just that it was legal.

The Selma PD (a notorious suburb of San Antonio that was called, correctly, a "speeed trap" in a Steve Earle song), a few years ago stopped a friend of mine while she and her husband were test driving a new mini van on IH-35 on a Sunday afternoon. The Selma PD stopped her because the dealer plate was improperly displayed. The dealership had made her leave her purse behind, and there was no insurance card in the mini van, so the Selma PD officer gave her citations for no License Plate, no Driver's License, and no Proof of Insurance.

Hard ball to be sure, but legal.

The Selma Officer then said that because she had no Drivers Licenseon her (although his radio could have confirmed that she had one), he had to take her photograph and fingerprints, which he did on the side of IH-35. While her husband watched, and while she was seven months pregnant, which is why she and her husband were looking at mini vans.

Legal?

Yes.

Offensive and stupidly counter productive?

Certainly.

79 posted on 03/24/2006 7:41:41 PM PST by Pilsner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Pilsner
I didn't say this was a good idea, just that it was legal.

LOL!

Great line.

80 posted on 03/24/2006 7:43:51 PM PST by Proctor (I risk my life to bring you http://www.historyofjihad.org & http://www.islamcomicbook.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson