Skip to comments.
'Diversity Day' canceled over 'gay' speakers Homosexual couple didn't want Christians represented
WND ^
| 3-22-06
Posted on 03/22/2006 3:10:24 PM PST by Indy Pendance
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
To: Indy Pendance
Can't let the truth sneak out to those kids, now, can we?
2
posted on
03/22/2006 3:12:00 PM PST
by
Right Wing Assault
("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
To: Indy Pendance
"The committee then decided it would be best to cancel the whole program."
Good plan!
3
posted on
03/22/2006 3:14:41 PM PST
by
i_dont_chat
(I defend the right to offend!)
To: Indy Pendance
the biannual event So even the event swings both ways.
4
posted on
03/22/2006 3:15:57 PM PST
by
Michael.SF.
(Well, Kerry did win the exit polls.)
To: Indy Pendance
"Non-positive groups were not what we were going for," said committee member Ellen ByersChristianity didn't fit the agenda because the objective was to corrupt youthful minds.
To: stainlessbanner
It's only 'diverse' if you agree with the liberal agenda.
To: Indy Pendance
I saw no representation in the list for Whirling Dirtbags.
To: Indy Pendance
Attleson said the homosexual couple scheduled to speak refused to be on the program alongside an "ex-gay" viewpoint, saying they would be uncomfortable. Apparently this couple of queers do not realize that, "...they're going to come into contact with people of different backgrounds."
8
posted on
03/22/2006 3:18:15 PM PST
by
CzarNicky
(The problem with bad ideas is that they seemed like good ideas at the time.)
To: Wally_Kalbacken
I didn't see wiccans either. :)
To: Indy Pendance
The best way to combat this idiocy is to require events such as this to represent so many viewpoints including those they don't like (Christian, conservative) that it's impossible to organize such an event, or at least not without bogging it down with controversy over who gets to speak. It's too bad that we have to do this on the left's terms, but there are still chinks in their legal armor to exploit.
10
posted on
03/22/2006 3:18:36 PM PST
by
Firefigher NC
(You light ‘em, we fight ‘em!)
To: Indy Pendance
Gregg Attleson... told the LaCrosse paper the intent is to introduce students to minorities and people with alternative lifestyles. Well, would not an ex-gay, now Christian, be an alternative to an alternative life style? What could be more alternative then that?
11
posted on
03/22/2006 3:19:22 PM PST
by
Michael.SF.
(Well, Kerry did win the exit polls.)
To: Indy Pendance
"It's ironic, because we're trying to be tolerant and at the same time we might be accused of being intolerant, said Byers, an English teacher.
Amazing lack of brains. Somehow they don't understand that some views are intolerant of others. Kum ba ya.
To: Indy Pendance
"...dispel some of the stereotypes."
Who knows, some of the speakers might very well reinforce stereotypes, since there is usually a rational basis for stereotypes.
13
posted on
03/22/2006 3:19:54 PM PST
by
Ninian Dryhope
("Bush lied, people dyed. Their fingers." The inestimable Mark Steyn)
'"It's ironic, because we're trying to be tolerant and at the same time we might be accused of being intolerant, said Byers, an English teacher.'
Ironic isn't the first word that pops into my mind.
To: Michael.SF.
I suppose you think you're funny, smart aleck.
I guess that's O.K., though, 'cuz that WAS funny.
15
posted on
03/22/2006 3:23:57 PM PST
by
biggerten
(Love you, Mom.)
To: Wally_Kalbacken
"I saw no representation in the list for Whirling Dirtbags."
Quite true and very shocking when one considers what an important subgroup Muslims are in this country.
16
posted on
03/22/2006 3:24:47 PM PST
by
Ninian Dryhope
("Bush lied, people dyed. Their fingers." The inestimable Mark Steyn)
To: Indy Pendance
Attleson said the homosexual couple scheduled to speak refused to be on the program alongside an "ex-gay" viewpoint, saying they would be uncomfortable.See, they hadn't taken the Tom Daschle School of Social Discourse classes. "Uncomfortable" isn't as good a reason for doing something cowardly and stupid as "Deeply troubled" or "Concerned" is. You gotta get this stuff right!
Seriously, what a bunch of candy-butts! I didn't want to do it because I was "uncomfortable"? Yeah, Nathan Hale didn't want to hang, nor Paul Revere to ride, nor anybody to do anything worthwhile because it made them "uncomfortable". Sheesh!
17
posted on
03/22/2006 3:33:32 PM PST
by
Mad Dawg
(If you find yourself in a fair fight, you did not prepare properly.)
To: Indy Pendance
'Diversity Day' canceled over 'gay' speakers Homosexual couple didn't want Christians represented"
When interviewed the gays insisted they weren't against Christians, but rather they just love irony.
18
posted on
03/22/2006 3:35:17 PM PST
by
jdm
To: Indy Pendance
Seems no one's more intolerant than those professing tolerance.
To: Indy Pendance
Or Pyromaniac Arsonists for that matter! What? So my kicks get me thrown in jail for a few years. I'm diverse, too!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson