Not really - the fact that we require a license to drive, and the implication that there is a method for positive identification moots the whole point. If they try to implant something in me for the purpose of controlling me wherever I am, or insist on identification to buy food and other essentials, then I will become very worried and fight it with everything I have.
But I agree. Each state does require a license to drive, and the fingerprint system described in the article is nothing more than a faster way to identify those preople who would otherwise have to go to the station.
And as long as this remains a state issue, legal under the state constitution and passed by the legislature with the consent of the governed, I have no dog in that hunt.