Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Concealed-carry bill vetoed (KS)
Kansas City Star ^ | Mar. 22, 2006 | DAVID KLEPPER and JIM SULLINGER

Posted on 03/22/2006 10:24:00 AM PST by neverdem

The Star’s Topeka correspondents

Kansas lawmakers pledge effort to overrule Sebelius

TOPEKA — Gov. Kathleen Sebelius vetoed a bill Tuesday that would allow Kansans to carry concealed weapons, setting up a face-off with lawmakers already vowing to attempt to overrule her.

It is uncertain whether the majority of lawmakers who support the bill can meet the two-thirds votes required to override the veto, which was widely expected. An attempt to reject the veto could come as early as today.

Sebelius, a Democrat, also vetoed a bill that could have lowered compensation settlements for workers injured on the job.

In a statement attached to her veto of the concealed-weapons bill, Sebelius said she could not “support allowing hidden weapons into businesses, restaurants, malls and any number of other public places.”

Overriding the veto would take two-thirds of both the House and the Senate: 84 House members and 27 senators. The House last week approved the bill 90-33. The Senate passed the bill last month 29-11.

If those votes hold, the Legislature can override the veto. But lawmakers — particularly Democrats — may not want to oppose Sebelius. Already, some Senate Democrats who voted for the bill said they were not sure what they would do.

“It will be close,” said Senate Majority Leader Derek Schmidt, an Independence Republican.

Sebelius vetoed a similar proposal in 2004, as did then-Gov. Bill Graves, a Republican, in 1997.

This year, however, leading supporters of the bill say they are confident they can muster the votes.

“If I had to give it odds, I’d say it’s certainly better than even money” the attempt will succeed, said Sen. Phil Journey, a Haysville Republican.

Rep. Candy Ruff, a Leavenworth Democrat who led the concealed-weapons fight in the House, said she and Journey always expected a veto, and have been working to ensure they have the votes.

Kansas is one of only four states with no concealed-weapons law.

Sebelius said she supported the Second Amendment and signed a bill last year allowing retired law enforcement officials to carry concealed weapons.

But she said she shared the concerns of groups opposed to concealed weapons.

“I continue to hear from the police chiefs and other law enforcement officials, members of the clergy, health-care workers and employers throughout our state that concealed weapons on the streets make our citizens less safe and secure,” she said.

Ruff said she has no qualms about crossing her party’s top elected official.

“It’s all about the issue, not about the governor,” she said.

Some lawmakers had hoped Sebelius, who is up for re-election this year, would allow the bill to become law, not wanting to risk the fallout and political opposition from the gun-rights lobby.

But Sebelius, who leads in polling and fundraising, did not do that.

“She’s comfortable enough with her margins that it wouldn’t have a significant enough political price,” Journey said.

Sebelius vetoed the bill that could have lowered compensation settlements for workers injured on the job, saying she saw no reason for the measure because the premiums Kansas companies paid for workers’ compensation were some of the lowest in the nation. She added that those rates were scheduled to decline 2 percent this year without the bill.

“Kansas is an attractive place to do business, and part of the reason for that is our low workers compensation costs,” she stated in her veto message.

The bill was supported by the Kansas Chamber of Commerce. It was opposed by the Kansas Trial Lawyers Association, unions, veterans’ organizations, teachers, nurses, and firefighters.

Opponents called the measure the biggest change in the workers’ compensation law since 1993.

It would have allowed a doctor to determine whether a disability caused by an on-the-job injury might have been partly because of a health condition, which could be used to reduce the compensation settlement.

Supporters said employers should not have to pay for part of an injury that was not suffered on the job.

Sebelius said current Kansas law already allowed pre-existing medical benefits to be taken into consideration when determining benefits.

She said military veterans worried that even though they were not wounded, the demands of active duty might be used to reduce a potential settlement in a job-injury case.

Supporters said they were disappointed by her veto, but not surprised.

Sen. Karin Brownlee, an Olathe Republican, said business owners have seen their workers’ compensation costs double in recent years because of the high cost of medical care and injuries not related to employment.

It is unlikely the Legislature could override the workers’ compensation veto.

The Senate approved the bill 28-12, which would be enough for an override.

But it received only 67 votes in favor in the House, which was far short of the 84 votes needed to override.

Concealed weapons bill

The bill, SB 418, would allow a person older than 21 who passes a background check and undergoes training to carry a concealed handgun in public. Convicted felons, or those with criminal histories of drug use, domestic violence, or multiple DUIs would be barred. Concealed weapons would be banned inside schools, bars, courtrooms, places of worship, and any building that posts a sign prohibiting them. Estimates are that about 20,000 Kansans would apply for the permits.

To reach David Klepper or Jim Sullinger, call (785) 354-1388 or send e-mail to dklepper@kcstar.com or jsullinger@kcstar.com.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Kansas
KEYWORDS: banglist; breakingyesterday
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
Good luck Kansas!
1 posted on 03/22/2006 10:24:03 AM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Our Dimowit Governor has vetoed CC TWICE now for Wisconsin. We're planning on showing him the door come November 3, 2006. Can't WAIT! :)


2 posted on 03/22/2006 10:25:32 AM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Sebelius said she could not “support allowing hidden weapons into businesses, restaurants, malls and any number of other public places.

Ooooooo, HIDDEN WEAPONS!

Sounds so much scarier than concealed.

3 posted on 03/22/2006 10:26:12 AM PST by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Most of law enforcement organizations here in Texas opposed the CCW law at first. After a number of years' experience, the same ones who opposed it are now in favor of it.


4 posted on 03/22/2006 10:26:38 AM PST by JeeperFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
So, if one is trained and is permitted, how can conceal carry be a detriment to society? It's the thugs and criminals that need a deterrent.
5 posted on 03/22/2006 10:26:55 AM PST by RSmithOpt (Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Ditto.

Good luck Kansas!

6 posted on 03/22/2006 10:27:49 AM PST by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Kansas is a Republican state with a socialist governor.


7 posted on 03/22/2006 10:31:57 AM PST by GarySpFc (de oppresso liber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puppage
“I continue to hear from the police chiefs and other law enforcement officials, members of the clergy, health-care workers and employers throughout our state that concealed weapons on the streets make our citizens less safe and secure,” she said.

God forbid you do your own research.

8 posted on 03/22/2006 10:32:10 AM PST by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
In a statement attached to her veto of the concealed-weapons bill, Sebelius said she could not “support allowing hidden weapons into businesses, restaurants, malls and any number of other public places.”

"After all," she would have loved to continue saying, "that is a right solely reserved for the criminals."

9 posted on 03/22/2006 10:32:36 AM PST by NonValueAdded ("If I were a Cuban, I'd certainly be on a raft," Isane Aparicio Busto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Crossing "His & Hers" matching handguns off the Christmas list...


10 posted on 03/22/2006 10:34:13 AM PST by DTogo (I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Good luck Wisconsin in November!!!


11 posted on 03/22/2006 10:34:39 AM PST by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Good luck to the citizens of Kansas!


12 posted on 03/22/2006 10:35:16 AM PST by GrandEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I just received an email from the NRA stating the senate override will be attempted today. There were about 4 dims and 2 pubbies Sebelius was putting pressure on according to the email.

Kansas can't elect a decent governor whether it be dim or pubbie. Graves was a republican but he wasn't much better.


13 posted on 03/22/2006 10:41:42 AM PST by bereanway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Kansas is one of only four states with no concealed-weapons law.

I'd bet money that well-connected Kansans get around this by being "deputized" after making a fat contribution to the local sheriff. Or, they have their own bodyguards.

It's the common man who most benefits from shall-issue CCW. I hope they override the b**ch.

14 posted on 03/22/2006 10:47:41 AM PST by jrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Round here unarmed, mentally-retarded people are more likely to get killed by the police than any CCW holders.


15 posted on 03/22/2006 10:54:41 AM PST by GourmetDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

Yeah, and if she doesn't allow law abiding citizens to get a permit then criminals won't carry "hidden" weapons into public places will they? What an idiot, as most dimwits are.


16 posted on 03/22/2006 11:46:00 AM PST by calex59 (seeing the light shouldn't make you go blind and, BTW, Stå sammen med danskerne !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: calex59
Does that mean she's give up her armed security detail?

Just a thought.

17 posted on 03/22/2006 12:12:15 PM PST by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Puppage
"Does that mean she's give up her armed security detail?"

I'm not from Kansas but I imagine that if this woman continues to carry on in this manner she's going to need that armed security detail where ever she goes.

Just a thought.

18 posted on 03/22/2006 12:18:09 PM PST by the anti-liberal (Hey, Al Qaeda: Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

KS deserves what they get they voted the Lib in.

My in-laws live in KS and I always remind them of what they voted for.


19 posted on 03/22/2006 12:21:13 PM PST by Rightly Biased (Valor is a Gift.Those having it never know for sure whether they have it till the test comes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

Interesting, since just about "everywhere" is by definition a public place now thanks to hysterical busy-bodies - i.e. anti-tobacco legislation. But notice the abrupt about-face when it comes to allowing the sheeple any semblence of self-defense in those very same public places.

In other words, die quietly, don't ask too many questions, and NO SMOKING!


20 posted on 03/22/2006 12:26:31 PM PST by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson